Read it and weep
|
that sucks. I would get one if I were in europe
|
I would TOTALLY buy that car!
Looks like that design is coming over here to replace the current Focus. I think I may hold out on the new car for a bit! Even if it is gas that car is kinda slick! |
I would never buy a dirty diesel like that when the fuel costs 25% more than gasoline. I would be much more impressed with a gasoline engine that gets 52mpg.
|
the fact is we won't see a car that gets 52mpg in the states, nor will we see this car in the states.
and diesel only runs 15-20% higer around here. gas hit over 4 at the max (I think it was 4.25) but diesel never hit 5. not around here that I remember |
I will not weep. I'll just move countries.
|
Quote:
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/2008c...f.jsp?id=21632 This is on the realistic EPA cycle. Not he fantasy football euro cycle. |
Quote:
|
That's fine by me. Fewer diesels here means more diesel fuel supply. More diesel fuel supply means less pressure on the biodiesel supply I prefer.
You go on driving your 58 mpg gasoline-electric Insight and I'll drive my 50 mpg (50.224 on a recent 900 mile trip) 2005 Passat wagon on B100. Want to compete on a total (including greenhouse gas) gram per mile emission rate? You'll need to get the gasoline powered vehicle up to 200 mpg to be greener. Note my sig: I think, therefore soy |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.