Fuelly Forums

Fuelly Forums (https://www.fuelly.com/forums/)
-   General Discussion (Off-Topic) (https://www.fuelly.com/forums/f22/)
-   -   "3 wheeled cars" (https://www.fuelly.com/forums/f22/3-wheeled-cars-9480.html)

Rayme 07-21-2008 03:04 PM

"3 wheeled cars"
 
https://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...284986028&rd=1

So I found that link..

I can see it now, those chinese made (I highly suppose) "cars" having 3 wheels to be registred as a motorcycle thus evading any crash laws...invading us slowly and slowly....now that oil prices are a hot topic!

:eek:

trautotuning 07-21-2008 04:59 PM

AHH!!!

It gets me everytime!! Why do they always use that design when it pretty much sucks!!!

Put two wheels in front and on in the back!!!! not the other way around!!!

ihatemybike 07-22-2008 04:20 AM

Yes the aerodynamics will be better with a tadpole trike, but for carrying/accessing a load two in the back seems to work better.

GasSavers_RoadWarrior 07-22-2008 04:38 AM

I think you only need about a third the components on the front end for single wheel steering vs 2 wheel.

GasSavers_BEEF 07-22-2008 05:00 AM

I actually started a thread about these things. here is a link to the web site.

https://www.wildfirevehicles.com/What...ew_models.html

I talked to a guy from the web and he said they started around 7K. he also pointed out that you could flip them over if you take a hard corner and the weight is distributed wrong.

I have all but talked myself out of these for a lot of reasons. A/C is not an option and with 26hp, I don't think you could put one on it period.

it is still a neat idea.

GasSavers_Erik 07-22-2008 06:30 AM

Speaking of 3 wheelers- I would like to take a small old motorcycle (like my 305 Kawasaki) and put a log sidecar on it and then move all the controls into the sidecar so the driver and passenger could ride recumbent, bobsled style- then cover the whole thing with an aerodynamic skin.

The biggest worry would be a side impact... Statistically, I wonder which side is more likely to be hit in a side impact that is not the struck driver's fault?

GasSavers_RoadWarrior 07-22-2008 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erik (Post 112108)
Statistically, I wonder which side is more likely to be hit in a side impact that is not the struck driver's fault?

I've heard that the driver instinctively tries to protect himself, so the passenger side is more likely to be sacrificed.

GasSavers_GasUser 07-22-2008 06:53 AM

I gotta have 4 wheels under me.

Just my opinion, of course.

Snax 07-23-2008 08:57 PM

I'm thinkin' that over-revving it could be a seriously disturbing event. I hope that driver seat cushion is shielded with Kevlar!

ihatemybike 07-24-2008 04:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erik (Post 112108)
Speaking of 3 wheelers- I would like to take a small old motorcycle (like my 305 Kawasaki) and put a log sidecar on it and then move all the controls into the sidecar so the driver and passenger could ride recumbent, bobsled style- then cover the whole thing with an aerodynamic skin.

Personally, I like this idea.
https://www.autocult.com.au/img/gallery/WGS3CL9N.jpg
Tri-magnum - Homebuild using R.Q.Riley Plans


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.