US Automakers Challenge Emissions Rules (again).
Some interestingly absurd bits in this NY Times Article, such as...
"Among other points, the industry says more fuel efficient cars could be dangerous, because they will be cheaper to drive and lead people to drive more and potentially have more accidents. ?Everybody?s getting a good laugh out of the safety claim,? said David Bookbinder, a lawyer for the Sierra Club, which is a party to the case. ?Detroit is saying it?s a bad idea for everybody to drive more.? |
Priceless.
|
Quote:
|
"Among other points, the industry says more fuel efficient cars could be dangerous, because they will be cheaper to drive and lead people to drive more and potentially have more accidents."
That is rich lol |
Quote:
People drive more? Really now, how much of an impact has high fuel prices had on driving habits? This forum isn't a representative sample - but everyone on this forum probably sees the same thing I do - lots of people filling up, lots of people on the road. Perhaps one bike every 30-50 miles (if that) :/ |
"In the real world, Detroit's vehicles already consume less fuel than imports," said Bob Klutz, "since the amount of time they spend in the shop more than makes up for the tow needed to get them there."
|
The automakers are characteristically caught with their pants down. Nothing new, really. Yet at the same time, they still won't change their ways even as they embarass themselves further. Big government is on their side, ready to bail out GM's $300 billion in debt if it comes to it. Next thing, they'll be whining for import restrictions like they did in the 1970s and 1980s!
|
Quote:
The definition of Insanity is continually doing the same things while expecting changed results. Maybe it's crazy for us to expect it to be different if nothing else changes. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.