Fuelly Forums - 7 billion by 2010

Fuelly Forums (https://www.fuelly.com/forums/)

- General Discussion (Off-Topic) (https://www.fuelly.com/forums/f22/)

- - 7 billion by 2010 (https://www.fuelly.com/forums/f22/7-billion-by-2010-a-11768.html)

i still think soylent green is the answer

Simple Green works pretty good too!

When I was about 15 or so, I read "The Population Bomb". They were predicting seven billion by about 10 years ago. We've done a little better.

That book was the main reason I have never had any kids (something most people just don't understand).

Thinking about it, though...I'll be at the top level of the Social Security pyramid club in about 13 or 14 years...hope there's enough new folks at the bottom paying in...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay2TheRescue (Post 139823)

All this talk of population control, and nobody has mentioned Logan's Run?

Good movie...here's a shot of my favorite character...

https://www.slipperybrick.com/wp-cont...05/robobox.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by RoadWarrior (Post 140044)

Pre or post coital?

LOL, it's non toxic and biodegradable, much easier clean up than the old Wesson oil party.:D

regards
gary

Quote:

Originally Posted by SentraSE-R (Post 139939)

Bowtieguy, What do you know about Big Pharma? I worked a career with the Food and Drug Administration. Your claim that Big Pharma is cutting off its own throat is just plain wrong.

Reality check. I don't know where you got your figures from, but they don't remotely approach reality. A study by the Commonwealth Fund found seven out of ten working age women, or 64 million, are uninsured or underinsured for health care. Add >39% of working age men, and the figures are about twenty times worse than your claims. The situation is far from the rosy scenario you propose.

i know big pharma is a part of the 3 headed monster running up the cost of healthcare(medicare/medicaid and the American lack of nutrition and exercise are the other 2 heads). i said big pharm WOULD be cutting its own throat if...

reality? the liberal view of counting illegals and those that choose not to buy health insurance is quite slanted for political and agenda expediency. did you read my previous post in its entirety?

granted, the 5 million(or more) is an issue, but rushing into the first half-debated legislation would be a huge mistake. just like welfare, the ones that need the most care, might not get it!

Who are these people that can't afford insurance anyways? I have no degree and have had health insurance since I graduated high school(my first job was $7.75/hr in a call center).

Heck, my last job I made a whooping $11.00 an hour supporting me and my (ex)gf that was a full time student. I not only paid for my health care but hers too and we had plenty of money to still eat out, go to the movies every weekend, and all the bills were paid.

i'm w/a kyle! there is a very suprising number that chooses not to buy--be it a legit hardship or not.

it makes we wonder what they do spend on!

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowtieguy (Post 140082)

i know big pharma is a part of the 3 headed monster running up the cost of healthcare(medicare/medicaid and the American lack of nutrition and exercise are the other 2 heads).

I think there are more heads than listed above. Malpractice costs, the status of supply vs. demand, aging population that is kept alive for longer with more expensive treatment (the same can be said of terminally ill patients), and probably some other things I missed are also huge contributors to the cost.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dkjones96 (Post 140084)

$11/hr: 440/wk, 1907/mo, 22880/yr. Let's say the government goes easy on you, and you take home 80% of that: 352/wk, 1525/mo, 18304/yr. In RI, you could not rent a studio apartment in the ghetto and pay for the cheapest individual health plan available, let alone for two people to eat groceries and one person to go to school, and presumably a car, and then eating out too? Can't be done. Cost of living must be much less where you live.