Fuelly Forums

Fuelly Forums (https://www.fuelly.com/forums/)
-   Experiments, Modifications and DIY (https://www.fuelly.com/forums/f9/)
-   -   Alternator v. no alternator - 10% gain @ 70 km/h (https://www.fuelly.com/forums/f9/alternator-v-no-alternator-10-gain-70-km-h-2261.html)

rh77 10-23-2006 06:30 PM

Great Experiment!
 
Great Experiment as always!

I wonder if you could hook up a switch that's tied into the alternator's draw to switch the load on and off...

For example, on decel with engine on, you could flip the heavy-duty switch to begin charging (kinda like TangoJetta's fuse, but with a switch). This may extend battery life.

RH77

JanGeo 10-23-2006 06:58 PM

Another thing to consider is the injector response is changed slightly when the battery voltage is reduced - think about it - it gets a pulse of a certain voltage which may be the full battery voltage through the ECU. Lower that voltage and the valve may open a little slower and end up leaning the air/fuel mixture - anyone ever trim the supply voltage to extend the mixture range? If anything it could affect performance at higher RPM.

onegammyleg 10-23-2006 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rh77
Great Experiment as always!

I wonder if you could hook up a switch that's tied into the alternator's draw to switch the load on and off...

For example, on decel with engine on, you could flip the heavy-duty switch to begin charging (kinda like TangoJetta's fuse, but with a switch). This may extend battery life.

RH77

Perhaps it wasnt noticed last time I said it , so Ill say it again ,, it wouldnt be hard to make up a switching arrangement so that the alt only charges when neutral is selected and the brake light is on.
This likely would mean you are stopped at the lights idling or rolling down a hill.

Alternatively it could be switched by a vacuum switch.

Of course keeping an eye on an ammeter and voltmeter gauge set would be handy just to make sure your not leaving the battery discharged.

cfg83 10-23-2006 11:52 PM

Brock -

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
Oh, one thing I use a lot is a Deltran water proof battery tender. It charges at a lowly 800 mA up to 14.6v and then drops back to 13.2v float. I would strongly recommend one of these (or a larger version) if your messing with a disconnected alt. The battery will die a quick death cycling it without a good true full charge. I use this charger on our van, I suspect the alternator is a bit off in the van and never full charges the battery.

On the wagon the Deltran will show a full charge in 30 minutes and the van takes 4-6 hours.

Even running the alternator as normal the cars starts much quicker in winter and I figure it doesn't have to run the alternator as hard to get the battery charged back up after sitting a while since it starts “full”.

Even a solar charger would likely work in most cases for this "topping off" of the battery

I looked up the "Deltran water proof battery tender". Could some circuitry go between that and say a Uni-Solar flexible solar panel (FLX-11) with these specs :

Rated Power (Wp) = 10
Max Power Point VMPP (V) = 16.5
Max Power Point IMPP (A) = 0.6
Short Circuit Current ISC (V) = 0.8
Length/Widht = 21" x 17"

The max Amp of 0.6 may be too wimpy, yes?

If no, then would a smaller Deltran charger be more appropriate?

Or maybe skip the charger alltogether and attach the solar panel directly to the car via some simple cicuitry, yes?

Thanks,

CarloSW2

onegammyleg 10-24-2006 01:11 AM

Quote:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock
The battery will die a quick death cycling it without a good true full charge. I use this charger on our van, I suspect the alternator is a bit off in the van and never full charges the battery.

On the wagon the Deltran will show a full charge in 30 minutes and the van takes 4-6 hours.

Even running the alternator as normal the cars starts much quicker in winter and I figure it doesn't have to run the alternator as hard to get the battery charged back up after sitting a while since it starts ?full?.

Even a solar charger would likely work in most cases for this "topping off" of the battery
I dont fully agree with the statement ?The battery will die a quick death cycling it without a good true full charge.?
Lead acid batteries die most often from water loss from overcharging , being left disharged or undercharged for long periods of time and to a lesser extent overheating from external sources.

If a switchable ALT was employed and the battery returned to full before switching the engine off (or charging of AC at home up to full) then I really doubt any significant life reduction of a battery.

In fact , it may even extend the life if the car is always overcharging it.

I think it would need some experimentation to bust or umm ,unbust? this one , unfortunately the results would take years to obtain and even then , there are many variables that can affect battery life even in normal service.

onegammyleg 10-24-2006 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onegammyleg
,, it wouldnt be hard to make up a switching arrangement so that the alt only charges when neutral is selected and the brake light is on.
This likely would mean you are stopped at the lights idling or rolling down a hill.

Alternatively it could be switched by a vacuum switch.

I have revised my idea , , just have it switched when the brake pedal is pushed.
The now charging ALT will also give a braking effect as well.

This could save on brake pad/disc wear + with the FE savings from effectively no ALT it must come out on top against the possible life reduction of the battery.

i think its worth a try

onegammyleg 10-24-2006 02:49 AM

What poo-poo's that idea is that ime normally coasting in N by the time I touch the brake pedal. :)

MetroMPG 10-24-2006 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onegammyleg
What poo-poo's that idea is that ime normally coasting in N by the time I touch the brake pedal. :)

Me too. An alternator that only charges during braking, idling or engine over-run would rarely get used in my car. I hardly do much of those things - the battery would be dead pretty quickly.

Besides, what about those massive losses to belt friction and the pulley fan while the alt isn't being used? So wasteful... :D

Silveredwings 10-24-2006 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Me too. An alternator that only charges during braking, idling or engine over-run would rarely get used in my car. I hardly do much of those things - the battery would be dead pretty quickly.

Besides, what about those massive losses to belt friction and the pulley fan while the alt isn't being used? So wasteful... :D

From the sounds of it, you'd be running a loss just for energizing the alternator field windings. :)

MetroMPG 10-24-2006 05:39 AM

OT - Silveredwings: You sold the BMW too? Did I miss a thread? Are you bicycling everywhere now?

JanGeo 10-24-2006 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Me too. An alternator that only charges during braking, idling or engine over-run would rarely get used in my car. I hardly do much of those things - the battery would be dead pretty quickly.

Add to that my xB adds more fuel if the electrical load increases even at idle.

GasSavers_Brock 10-24-2006 07:47 AM

Jangeo Deltran actually makes a 5.5 and 20 amp version as well but once you get up to about 20 amps I would suggest the Iota line with a smart controller, they are cheaper for charging amp.

Gregg you are correct, maybe I wasn't clear. Overcharging a battery is bad for it. When I say a fully charged battery I am assuming a safe good full regulated charge, definitely not over charging the battery. Also deep discharges in particular a complete discharges will and do damage a lead acid battery. The longest life, or most watts out of a battery will be obtained by cycling the battery to abut 70% charged or sucking about 30% of the power out and then fully correctly charging it again.

And yes most car alternators do a poor job of correctly charging a battery and often over charge the battery thus shortening its life.

Silveredwings 10-24-2006 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetroMPG
OT - Silveredwings: You sold the BMW too? Did I miss a thread? Are you bicycling everywhere now?

Yes I sold both the Passat and the BMW convertible (I'll sure miss that one) and got an '02 BMW 325 wagon. It's really nice. :thumbup: :) Of course 2 days after I got the 'new' one someone ran an '06 Cadillac into it but that's a whole thread wannabe. :(

I'm getting 32 - 37 depending on traffic but I'm still getting used to the clutch and its short gearing.

I need to learn how to fix the entries in my GS garage...

MetroMPG 10-24-2006 08:58 AM

You should definitely start a new thread. Let's hear the whole messy story. (While Matt's updating the garage code - note: looks like he didn't understand part of your post in the link you provided above.)

Silveredwings 10-24-2006 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetroMPG
You should definitely start a new thread. Let's hear the whole messy story. (While Matt's updating the garage code - note: looks like he didn't understand part of your post in the link you provided above.)

OK I will. Yeah, I saw that. English isn't my first language ... confusion is. :D

onegammyleg 10-24-2006 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
And yes most car alternators do a poor job of correctly charging a battery and often over charge the battery thus shortening its life.

I remember seeing in a car magazine once a writeup on a battery out of a very old 6 volt VW beetle.
Aparantly true , this car had the same battery and it lasted 40 or so years before finnaly giving up.

Amazing.

onegammyleg 10-24-2006 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theclencher
My '94 F150 still has factory battery and alternator. Plus it still has factory coolant, exhaust system, brakes, etc...

Thats prety good :thumbup:

JanGeo 10-25-2006 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
Jangeo Deltran actually makes a 5.5 and 20 amp version as well but once you get up to about 20 amps I would suggest the Iota line with a smart controller, they are cheaper for charging amp.

YIKES the price for 20 amps is just CRAZY $315+ as I recall so I went on eBay and picked up a 20 amp variac (not the china version) and added a 35 amp full wave bridge and POOF a variable 20-25amp charger for less than $50 just no regulation. But what happens is I set the voltage with the Variac dial and it automatically tapers off the current as the Hawkers reach their peak charge. But I give it a little extra at the start of the bulk charging for the first half an hour to an hour. My problem is that I want to charge 3 or 4 - 25ah batteries in series at a time so the adjustable Variac was the best solution and the cheepest. A little ripple at the high current is not a problem and towards the end of the charge all the caps in the system filter out the ripple pretty well so no overvoltage. I also got a motor on the Variac that I could use to run some regulation so that as the peak occurs the motor would dial back the voltage - that will come next.

More news from eCycle - they have been testing the next generation of controller with the regen voltage regulation/limiting and have been pushing 400+ amps from 48 volts (4 group 29 batteries) and the results look great. They will probably push the unit to 600 amps peak and 400 continuous (20kw!!) that you can hold in one hand!!!

GasSavers_Brock 10-25-2006 12:20 PM

JanGeo you are the regulator ;) I have a similar setup myself. I just prefer to recommend an automated 3 or 4 stage charger to people who don't understand proper charging or don’t have the time to watch it themselves.

And ya the Deltran chargers are a lot for what they are, but for someone like my brother who wants to connect it and walk away and then forget it for a week, Deltran is the way to go. I really like the Iota chargers in the larger amperages as well and they are more reasonably priced. Again you can build them yourself for a lot less if you know what you’re doing :)

WOW, 20KW that is some serious power. Do you have a link to them?

JanGeo 10-25-2006 04:00 PM

I do have the Deltran 12 volt 5.5amp unit for the Hawkers and it is pretty smart in that it holds 14.9 volts for 6 hours to top off the cells and balance them then drops to 13.5 to float them. Fortunately I have PowerChek modules on the 3 in series so one Deltran does all three at the same time taking a little bit longer to fully charge by like you say - set it and forget it. BUT the variac can put out 1200-1500 watts on 3 or 4 batteries - darn line cord gets hot!

Yeah 20kw is going to be great - just wish it wasn't $995. I think I will setup my scooter and push the motors that I have to 200 amps or more and see how they handle it - from what I have seen they start to moan and really pull when I start pumping in the amps. They are rated at 225 continuous if properly cooled but I only need a lot of amps for a few seconds to get to full speed. The new controllers are not on line yet so don't look for them. They are a join venture with another big company and eCycle has taken the driver section of the controller from Navitas and adapted a newly designed control logic with the proper sensing and limiting to plug into the driver board and made a great new product. More testing is being done with it and maybe a price break will occure later this year. The only thing left is some programming of the limits to make it easier to set - right now it requires resistor changing and some jumpers. I already Told Dan I was interested in one before the end of this year.

MetroMPG 10-25-2006 05:23 PM

Good link, clencher. You're the link man for sure.

GasSavers_Brock 10-26-2006 07:41 AM

The thing I keep coming back to is only the 15% loss on the alternator. I find it really hard to believe that an alternator can turn 85% of the mechanical power in to electrical energy. Maybe they do, but it seems really high to me. Heck a switching inverter is lucky to be 90% efficient with no moving parts. And a DC motor attached to an AC motor is also only about 50% efficient. So how the heck can an alternator be more efficient then a motor inverter? I would think an alternator is about 50% efficient at the top end. Maybe I am all wet, but this just doesn’t sit right with me.

It also wouldn't explain the larger gains we are seeing by disabling them. 100w or less then 1/4 HP should mean a 10% increase in mileage HP wise. Maybe they are 85% efficient at 50% loading and only 25% efficient at 10% or normal loading?

JanGeo 10-26-2006 08:58 AM

Numbers I get from eCycle is that the alternator is about 60% efficient but again at what load. They have a pretty free spinning rotor even when magnitized and slip ring brushes so not much loss there so you get into I2R losses at high currents and the diode drops all the time. It really comes down to how much current the car draws constantly . . . 20 amps at 14 volts is 280 watts doubled for 50% efficiency is still only 560 watts . . . add some belt and fan losses in the alternator and you get less than 1 HP. If you like I can run an alternator on an electric motor and tell you how many watts it takes - all I need is a belt and pulley for the motor.

GasSavers_Brock 10-26-2006 11:29 AM

Sounds like way to much work but I would be curious to know what it really takes to drive the alt.

It's funny you mention that because one of my first thoughts was to drive the alternator in my car off a 1 hp DC motor from the spare battery. Seemed like an evil circle and I thought the losses would be less to go the inverter/charger route. It also allows me to very easily re-connect the alternator for trips or if my wife takes the car.

MetroMPG 10-28-2006 07:35 AM

Posting this message on behalf of John David Shelton, who is the founder/moderator of the MaxMPG Yahoo group: https://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/maxmpg/

John David is currently serving in Iraq. He has limited bandwidth (thus the request to post this for him).

EDIT: his personal web site: https://maxmpg.org/

Feel free to reply to his thoughts on alternators / charging (prompted by this thread and my write-up at metrompg.com). He periodically reads stuff here at GS.

Quote:

Originally Posted by John David Shelton
Do you know of any alternators that are built to be more efficient? Do any of the hybrids have them and if so are they more efficient? What about a DC motor that puts out 14V, would that be a more efficient solution? I read once about a companythat was making a mild hybrid kit with a DC motor in place of the alternator along with a controller and battery or capacitor pack. It would help turn the drive train while also providing DC power.
How about using a clutch sort of like what air conditioner compressors use? That way you could get nearly the same benefits as no alternator connected but the option is there to switch it on. It would probably f reewheel easier than simply turning off the power to the alternator so it doesn't see any load.

I really like the idea of a thermocoupler. You might not get the same amount of power as with an alternator but you could possibly leave the alternator on the vehicle with a kill switch and just use it when the thermocouples can't keep up. Or, install a tiny 35 amp alternator such as was discussed in the thread to be augmented by the thermocouples. When I get back from Iraq, I'm going to look into figuring out how to build something like that. Since I've becom e interested in efficiency I've wanted to try and figure out a way to capture or use the heat energy lost in the exhaust. It's such a waste.

Concerning the turbo alternator, is it possible to put it anywhere on an exhaust? Does a turbo have to be on the manifold? Turbos spin a lot faster than an alternator, how difficult would it be to control the ra te at which a turbo spins an alternator? In a turbo alternator, would an experimentor simply build a fan on the alternator to be spun by the compressed air coming from the turbo or would it need to directly coupled somehow?

The electric water pump is something I'm going to try as soon as I can afford it, along with an electric power steering pump. There are off the shelf systems available for the water pump. The power steering migh t be more difficult. I'd prefer to go with manual steering but it looks as though my truck never had manual steering available as an option and I haven't been able to determine if the Nissan Pathfinder manual steering gear would drop in to my truck.&nbs p;The MR2 has a 12v steering pump and quite a few EVers have used this in their conversions.

And one last thought about batteries. In nearly every make and model of car, no matter what options are installed, the batteries are the same size, usually the same model of battery for every car. My truck, a st ripped down 1998 Nissan Frontier, has the same battery as the truck with all the options. So do I have more battery than I need? If true, make you think how many cars out there have too much battery and are needlessly wasting fuel chargin g batteries that are too big? Is it possible to run a vehicle, especially a small vehicle like a metro, off of a motorcycle sized battery? It would save weight and reduce charging requirements. Also, with a smaller battery it could be more easily r elocated to someplace else on the vehicle to give it a lower center of gravity to help a driver carry more speed through a corner allowing him to brake less. It's a minor amount, but I suppose every bit counts. I'm considering moving my battery to the f rame rails

If anybody has any suggestions for these ideas, please share them with the group.


MetroMPG 10-28-2006 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
The thing I keep coming back to is only the 15% loss on the alternator.

I've read figures ranging anywhere from 60% - 90% efficiency. Wikipedia states 90% efficiency for modern alternators (without any further information).

MetroMPG 10-28-2006 07:47 AM

I'll take a stab at a couple of John David's points...

Quote:

Originally Posted by John David Shelton
Do you know of any alternators that are built to be more efficient? Do any of the hybrids have them and if so are they more efficient?

As far as I know, they don't have conventional alternators. The Toyotas and Hondas use DC-DC converters to step down the hybrid pack from high voltage to 13.5 (or whatever). I'm not sure if that's ultimately more efficient than running an alternator, since the gasoline engine ultimately does most of the recharging of the hybrid pack (with regen kicking in some as well).

Quote:

How about using a clutch sort of like what air conditioner compressors use?
To figure out if that would work, you'd need to know how much power the electromagnetic clutch draws in order to be engaged.

JanGeo 10-28-2006 01:20 PM

You know I was just thinking if we knew the amount of watt hours that we would need to operate for a desired time how about using a higher voltage NiMh or NiCad pack and regulate it to 14 volts out - I have some cheep 20-60 volts input 15 volts out (adjustable) - switching regulator modules 80% efficient and since the NiMh battery can be cycled a lot more than an SLA that could supliment the cars 12 volt battery and you could run a 12 volt to high voltage charger to recharge when going down long hills or slowing down although that recharge time would be minimum - solar or grid recharge would be easy enough at higher voltage.

DRW 10-31-2006 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John David Shelton
If true, make you think how many cars out there have too much battery and are needlessly wasting fuel charging batteries that are too big? Is it possible to run a vehicle, especially a small vehicle like a metro, off of a motorcycle sized battery?

I have a downsized battery in my Laser. Originally it called for a 525CCA battery which weighed 35 pounds. I got a smaller 420CCA battery that weighs 28 pounds. Not a huge weight savings, but I needed a battery at the time, so I thought, why not get something lighter? My other car has a 13 pound deep cycle battery rated at 330CCA. Works fine, no problem starting it when cold.

Would a larger battery require more amps to recharge it if the ammount of discharge to start it is the same?

rh77 10-31-2006 05:32 PM

Diesels vs. Gassers
 
Unfortunately, gassers need ignition/spark to operate, whereas a Diesel doesn't need a battery once running. This and the electrical systems such as power steering on newer cars would require quite the load.

If you know your maximum commuting distance, adjust it for temperature, and perform the calcs, I'm sure a zero-alternator/plug-in system could be implemented. The cost/weight is up to the experts...

RH77

GasSavers_Brock 10-31-2006 06:57 PM

DRW there really isn't much of a penalty for a larger battery beside weight. Well a typical lead acid uses about 1% of its rated power a day to stay topped off. So you could say a typical 440CCA battery, about a 60AH battery uses about .6 amps a day. A battery twice the size would use 1.2 amps a day to stay topped off. Not much in the grand scheme of things, but something.

Rh77, while it’s true that diesels don’t need much power once warmed up they require a LOT to get up to temperature. Even in the middle of summer my car will run its coolant glow plugs (60 amps or about 800watts) until the coolant hits 120F. I believe it does this to warm the engine quicker to help with emissions. In winter the car will run the regular glow plugs (80 amps or just over 1000w) for about 10 seconds before cranking and about 20 seconds after cranking depending on the outside temp. The two sets of plugs never run at the same time though.

rh77 10-31-2006 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock
Rh77, while it?s true that diesels don?t need much power once warmed up they require a LOT to get up to temperature. Even in the middle of summer my car will run its coolant glow plugs (60 amps or about 800watts) until the coolant hits 120F. I believe it does this to warm the engine quicker to help with emissions. In winter the car will run the regular glow plugs (80 amps or just over 1000w) for about 10 seconds before cranking and about 20 seconds after cranking depending on the outside temp. The two sets of plugs never run at the same time though.

Ahh...didn't know that. From my Diesel ambulance days, (mid-90's Ford E350 Diesels) I don't believe the plugs were warmed at all unless called upon at startup. We ran a unit's batteries down to 0-volts on a long trip back to the station one stormy day when the alternator cable busted loose. It ran fine until we turned it off. Dunno about the emissions...

And yes, I was freezing cold most of the time in the Winter unless we drove a distance and kept it running all day.

RH77

red91sit 11-01-2006 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JanGeo
Another thing to consider is the injector response is changed slightly when the battery voltage is reduced - think about it - it gets a pulse of a certain voltage which may be the full battery voltage through the ECU. Lower that voltage and the valve may open a little slower and end up leaning the air/fuel mixture - anyone ever trim the supply voltage to extend the mixture range? If anything it could affect performance at higher RPM.

I know on Ford ECU's (since 1986) they've had injector pulse -vs- voltage talbes :eek: (in case any one was wondierng)

MetroMPG 11-01-2006 05:21 PM

I wonder how it compensates. I'd guess that probably injector performance gets sluggish as voltage drops, so it lengthens the pulses to ensure enough fuel gets in.

red91sit 11-02-2006 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetroMPG
I wonder how it compensates. I'd guess that probably injector performance gets sluggish as voltage drops, so it lengthens the pulses to ensure enough fuel gets in.

https://www.imagestation.com/picture/...7/ec388b36.jpg

I'm still tryign to figure out exactly what this does, but it clearly has something to do with voltage and injectors.

DRW 11-02-2006 08:42 PM

On the Mitsu ECU it uses something called 'deadtime' to adjust injector pulsewidth as system volts varies. Deadtime is a set ammount of pulsewidth added to the calculated injector open time. In effect, injectors need a certain ammount of time to open/close, during which they don't flow the full ammount of fuel. If volts are low, the injector opens slower. Once open it doesn't matter what the volts are. The Mitsu ecu has a table of deadtime values that can be changed, and they often need to, since swapping to larger injectors of higher or lesser quality is common in the DSM world. The stock deadtime values follow a similar curve to what red91sit posted.

DRW 11-02-2006 08:48 PM

Oh, one more thing. The Mitsu ECU stops trying to run the car at around 9 volts. There may be a similar cutoff point on other cars. YMMV :)

JanGeo 11-03-2006 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red91sit
https://www.imagestation.com/picture/...7/ec388b36.jpg

I'm still tryign to figure out exactly what this does, but it clearly has something to do with voltage and injectors.

As the voltage on the bottom of the graph is lowered (left) the intersection in the curve indicates the amount of added pulse width time - they may stay open a little longer depending upon the magnetic field strength and how quickly it decays which is a function of how hard it was energized.

BuffaloChips 11-03-2006 09:00 AM

Part of the reason for the mileage improvement is, of course, you took away the horsepower drain of the alternator. Sadly, the only thing is, you now are running solely on the battery(ies).

MetroMPG 11-17-2006 08:22 AM

The topic of generating electricity with thermocouples always seems to come up in the alternator-less threads.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.