Quote:
Try to name a few parts you can replace to improve reliability. Even with performance as the agenda it amazes me how many performance engine builders still put their faith in the reliability of OEM Parts over "aftermarket performance" parts. OEM distributors, headgaskets, bearings, cranks, and transmissions are all parts that few feel you'll need to ever upgrade with sub 400hp performance goals. |
Quote:
the few non-oem replacements that will improve reliability would be a pcv catchcan, aftermarket head studs, brake pads, and tires |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The OEM headbolts are fine on all non performance applications. If the head is off you might as well upgrade to aftermarket headstuds since they cost roughly the same. This is my old car and the current owner is coming up close to 30k boosted miles on the stock headbolts! CLICK HERE As for brakes do you know that RealTime-Racing's Acura Integra uses OEM NSX calipers on their fronts and OEM Integra calipers on the rears. Once again OEM is more than fine for non-performance applications. OEM FTW!!!! |
because the z1 isnt necissarily more reliable?? the y5 is better anyway. i dont know what your getting at.
i mention the pcv catch can because a decrease in the octane of the air/fuel mixture from an intake manifold that has been tarred up will eventually take the potency away from the motor and over time(many many miles), will hurt reliability. i mention head studs because eventually head gaskets blow and there is a better alternative for even the non performance application. dont get me wrong, oem headstuds are "fine", but the aftermarket is better. 30k miles is nothing on a honda, boosted or factory. i didnt say calipers, i said pads. fundamentally different as far as reliability goes. dude i read your post and even when performance is not on the agenda, at all what i listed does increase reliability on non performance applications. :) |
Quote:
Obviously it's going to be one path or the other. I just need to figure out which fork to take at this point. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
By the way I'm on my way to Home Depot you want me to pick you up a few more broad brushes? |
Quote:
Like I said, If I decide to try the turbo route, it won't be for performance reasons. I've committed to driving this particular car like my grandma would. In theory anyway, at cruise, turbochargers produce just enough boost to overcome the vacuum produced by the engine (thus increasing the operating efficiency), which is supposed to boost gas mileage by a few percent..... That's all moot for now anyway since I've got other fish to fry first.... For now, I'd be interested in finding out what is involved with converting from OBD0 to OBD1. Is it just a matter of swapping a few wires in the connector, or does it involve pulling a whole new engine harness? |
Quote:
|
Cool, thanks for the tips....
I've got another related question now. Since I'm finally homing in on my transmission combo, I want to be sure that any additional changes to my engine won't affect what rpm it works the best at. Currently, I seem to be the most efficient in the 3100 - 3500 rpm range (that's where I got 46mpg while gaining 2000 ft altitude over a 275 mile stretch of I-40, vs, only getting 43 mpg while losing 6000 ft over 150 miles at 2800-3000 rpm).... Would the MPFI conversion change where the engine operates best by very much? I'm going to swap in a DX trans w/ HF final drive so I can cruise at 31-3200 in 4th and reserve 5th for the flat/downhill stretches. It'll put me at 2600 at 75 mph.... If the "butter zone" goes up by even a few hundred rpm, I could end up shooting myself in the foot with the trans combo! While we're at it, what rpm do the VX engines work the best at? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.