--- What temp to heat Gas to? --- - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Tech, Troubleshooting and Repair > Experiments, Modifications and DIY
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 08-10-2008, 07:34 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
trautotuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 135
Country: United States
Question --- What temp to heat Gas to? ---

I will be testing the "fuel heating" myth soon.

One thing I need to know is how much to heat the fuel to, what do you guys think will be a good, safe temp? I have heard anything from 150 to 300 degrees.


-----------------------------------------------

Also If you have any ideas of how to heat (and possibly control) the fuel I will take into account any of these ideas and maybe use them.

What I am thinking is simply using the coolant, since it is always at 180 degrees.

-----------------------------------------------
Sources

"The colder the fuel, the larger the fuel fragments. This is why MPG drops as the temperature gets colder. However, too much heat (about 270F) may damage fuel molecules and cause knock. The optimum fuel temperature is 200F. "
http://www.sigmaautomotive.com/perfo...fuelheater.php

"For gasoline the, Design Temperature would need to be about + 200 deg Centigrade" = 392 fahrenheit!!
http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/...ny_P_ODonnell/

"Henry "Smokey" yunick of NASCAR fame designed, built, and patented a Hot Air engine which heated the air/fuel charge to over 400 degrees F before igniting it using waste heat from the coolant and exhaust, and a modified turbocharger to act as a one way valve to keep expanding gas and air going towards the cylinders. He tested it in a pontiac fiero 2.5L "Iron Duke" 4 cyl engine and achived nearly 300 HP and 100 MPG. This car was actually featured in a number of automotive magazines back in the mid 1980's. "
http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/144...emp-less-m-p-g


-----------------------------------------------


I checked my thermostat and it appears to have a 195 degree thermostat btw.


-----------------------------------------------
__________________

__________________
trautotuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2008, 07:51 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_Erik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,027
Country: United States
I would hate to hear that you had an engine fire so I think you should start with a comparison between 180 degrees F and "non heated". Even though the "non" heated will likely absorb some heat from the fuel rail. It seems like you might need to remove any grill block and do some highway testing to be sure the engine compartment is as breezy/cool as possible for the unheated.

Probably the best way to heat it would be to wrap a long piece of copper tubing around the top rad hose and then wrap it all with thick rags to keep the heat from coming out of the copper line.

Do you have a way to record the fuel temp from the driver's seat while you are driving? Maybe a indoor outdoor thermometer with a 10 foot cord and have the probe wrapped to a metal part of the fuel rail with plenty of aluminum foil and then put a rag over the foil.
__________________

GasSavers_Erik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2008, 08:43 PM   #3
Registered Member
 
trautotuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 135
Country: United States
The way I plan it is to use a Water to Air intercooler (used for intercooling on performance turbo cars)...



But instead of passing the water through the little wholes and the air through the big holes (to put it in simple terms), I will pass fuel through the little holes and the radiator water through the top holes.

And yes, I made a little inline fuel temp sensor that I will mount on the fuel rail to monitor fuel temps from the inside of the car. I made it from a typical oil temperature gauge for performance cars.

--------------------------------------------

One thing to consider is that those air/water intercoolers are only around 70% efficient which means that my temps would only get to around 13o degrees (I have a 180 degree thermostat).

However, once heats starts building up I would think that it would transfer and hold in heat much better and hopefully get it up to 140-150 degrees. I could also wrap the fuel line with copper wire in the exhaust (just one turn) to pre heat the fuel going into the air/water intercooler; but I will only do this if the temps dont get hot enough i do not want to risk anything
__________________
trautotuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 02:55 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 138
Country: United States
some waste veggie cars have fuel filters that are also heaters to liquify the oil. i dont think they are very expensive and i know their easy to put in. plus their thermostatically controlled.
kit352 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 07:26 AM   #5
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
If they're only 70% efficient transmitting heat from air to water, I suspect they will be more efficient with two liquids.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 08:02 AM   #6
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_RoadWarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,652
It's gonna be a another of those "depends on your vehicle" things.

Some vehicles get a lot of heat into the fuel rail, particularly Vee engines with the rail snug between banks.

Then, the typical modus operandi for a multipoint fuel injection system is at low demand to spray fuel into a port with a closed valve, before the valve opens. The fuel then evaporates from the heat from the head. Low demand is typically up to 20% duty cycle on the injectors, and at highway cruise speeds, that's about as much as you'll use. Ergo, if 90% of your driving is steady state highway driving, then it's only the other 10% that extra fuel heat will help you with.
__________________
I remember The RoadWarrior..To understand who he was, you have to go back to another time..the world was powered by the black fuel & the desert sprouted great cities..Gone now, swept away..two mighty warrior tribes went to war & touched off a blaze which engulfed them all. Without fuel, they were nothing..thundering machines sputtered & stopped..Only those mobile enough to scavenge, brutal enough to pillage would survive. The gangs took over the highways, ready to wage war for a tank of juice
GasSavers_RoadWarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 09:36 AM   #7
Site Team
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 659
Country: United States
Don't forget that when you heat the fuel, the pressure in your gas tank will increase. I'm sure different tanks have different venting systems, but don't forget to consider it.

-BC
__________________
Think you are saving gas? Prove it by starting a Gas Log, then conduct a proper experiment.
bobc455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 10:41 AM   #8
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,111
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to dkjones96
I imagine the fuel exiting that heater will be whatever the water going through it is at. MAYBE off by a degree or two depending on your fuel system. If it's return-free then I can almost guarantee you it'll be full temp by the time it leaves to the injectors.

If it is a return fuel system you will have a few things to contend with. Your fuel will be returning to the tank heated, this will cause an increase in vapor pressure not only while you are driving, but after you are stopped. This will lead to big fuel losses by evaporation unless you pressurize the tank. This can be a huge mistake depending on the construction of the tank itself. While it is running you will most likely want the tank venting into the intake but that might richen up the mixture a bit.

Additionally, your fuel pump uses the gasoline flowing through it to cool it so it will be running hotter as well.
__________________
- Kyle
dkjones96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 10:56 AM   #9
Registered Member
 
thornburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 162
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkjones96 View Post
If it is a return fuel system you will have a few things to contend with. Your fuel will be returning to the tank heated, this will cause an increase in vapor pressure not only while you are driving, but after you are stopped. This will lead to big fuel losses by evaporation unless you pressurize the tank. This can be a huge mistake depending on the construction of the tank itself. While it is running you will most likely want the tank venting into the intake but that might richen up the mixture a bit.
It is certainly a valid point that the fuel returning to the gas tank will be heated... but the comment about pressurization--aren't pretty much all modern gas tanks pressurized anyway?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dkjones96 View Post
Additionally, your fuel pump uses the gasoline flowing through it to cool it so it will be running hotter as well.
This could be concerning. I don't know what the operating specs of a fuel pump are, but if they are anything even remotely like the sump pump in my basement, you do NOT want to pump high-temp fluids with it. That sump pump gets hot pumping 50*F water... of course, it has a much higher flow rate, and has to move the liquid much farther.
__________________
thornburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 11:11 AM   #10
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,111
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to dkjones96
I meant pressurizing beyond what the tank normally runs.

I can't find a chart anywhere but at 126 degrees in the Mojave desert on a motorcycle we had enough pressure in a portable gas tank to blow the lid off the thing. Before that, we'd noticed that the bottle looked like Kirby but every time we released the pressure it just got it right back a minute or so later, if that.
__________________

__________________
- Kyle
dkjones96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Matching EPA Type to My Car DastardlyDan Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 10-26-2009 07:16 AM
Hydrogen or H2O Systems 1Jal1 General Fuel Topics 4 10-11-2008 02:20 AM
Why did it take me so long to find this place? Baranfin Introduce Yourself - New member Welcome 6 05-31-2008 05:17 PM
Higher speed not as bad as I thought mrmad General Fuel Topics 16 09-22-2007 10:55 PM
An American Perspective on Driving in Canada rh77 General Discussion (Off-Topic) 28 03-24-2006 10:42 PM

» Fuelly Android Apps
No Threads to Display.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.