Vortex Generators / Hmmm Airtabs - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Tech, Troubleshooting and Repair > Experiments, Modifications and DIY
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 05-26-2006, 06:19 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanGeo
Well I know a really boxy vehicle that shows greatly reduced MPG at higher speed that needs to be tested . . . my xB
And my Tahoe!
__________________
Kevin A Thornton
KAT Automotive
For Speed Equipment, Nitrous Express
katman@everestkc.net

For AMSOIL products
https://www.lubedealer.com/kat

For Herbs from the Amazon
https://www.168336.amazonherb.net
GasSavers_katman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2006, 06:59 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
I know it may be some trouble to try the test again, but your vortex generators might be too close to the trailing edge to be of benefit. On plane wings, the generators are closer to the front of the wing, to keep the air attached over the surface of the wing. You might want to try moving them forward a few inches, and see if there is any difference.

One thing that might be of interest is this quick doc on the generators, on the wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_generator), where it says they actually increase drag.
mosier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2006, 04:39 AM   #3
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
VG

Quote:
Originally Posted by katman
And my Tahoe!
Yeah but what percentage of your fuel consumption is to air drag compared to other drags of your vehicle? I know my xB gets better MPG at lower speeds and drops off over 40mph. Also think about AirTabs for $2.50 each in clear, black or white which have been wind tunnel tested.
JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2006, 06:59 AM   #4
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanGeo
Yeah but what percentage of your fuel consumption is to air drag compared to other drags of your vehicle? I know my xB gets better MPG at lower speeds and drops off over 40mph. Also think about AirTabs for $2.50 each in clear, black or white which have been wind tunnel tested.
I've thought about Airtabs in the past but then thought about making some and then people post other cool stuff and I start thinking about that and I procrastinate and get nothing done!
With the brush guard stuff on the Tahoe, which I don't want to take off, I know aerodynamic mods would help, but I'm having problems deciding what to use that won't change the looks too much. Clear Airtabs are a definite possibility. I've wondered about belly pans but are they effective on vehicles with large ground clearances? I never use the luggage rack so I could remove the cross bars. Then I could add a Ram Implosion Wing!
__________________
Kevin A Thornton
KAT Automotive
For Speed Equipment, Nitrous Express
katman@everestkc.net

For AMSOIL products
https://www.lubedealer.com/kat

For Herbs from the Amazon
https://www.168336.amazonherb.net
GasSavers_katman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2006, 02:10 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
zpiloto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by katman
Then I could add a Ram Implosion Wing!
Do you know anybody that tested that thing. It looks pretty hokie. It would be the ultimate whale tail. http://www.electrifyingtimes.com/Rob...Patterson.html
zpiloto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2006, 03:33 AM   #6
Registered Member
 
ZugyNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 587
I've studied the vg thing and have installed some.

I'd have to guess that the ones on the roof are in an area where the boundary layer has already separated to some extent....probably reducing their effectiveness. Maybe try moving them forward about a foot?

The ones on the deck lid are at a place where the air has pretty much separated for sure from the sharp drop at the window.

I had some on the roof of a hatchback with less slope...slightly different design of vg though...similar to the Mitsubishi kind. Found that silicone caulk is best for permanent mounting.

Good to see the accurate testing....and some positive results.


Here is a similar car with similar flows:

http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/cor...004/16E_03.pdf


vgs:

http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly18.html

http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly19a.html

Notice that he has his version of vg mounted the other direction? This plane cruises at around 60 mph.
__________________
Leading the perpetually ignorant and uninformed into the light of scientific knowledge. Did I really say that?

a new policy....I intend to ignore the nescient...a waste of time and energy.
ZugyNA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2006, 06:18 AM   #7
Registered Member
 
zpiloto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZugyNA
I've studied the vg thing and have installed some.

I'd have to guess that the ones on the roof are in an area where the boundary layer has already separated to some extent....probably reducing their effectiveness. Maybe try moving them forward about a foot?

The ones on the deck lid are at a place where the air has pretty much separated for sure from the sharp drop at the window.

I had some on the roof of a hatchback with less slope...slightly different design of vg though...similar to the Mitsubishi kind. Found that silicone caulk is best for permanent mounting.

Good to see the accurate testing....and some positive results.


Here is a similar car with similar flows:

http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/cor...004/16E_03.pdf


vgs:

http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly18.html

http://www.thirdshift.com/jack/firefly/firefly19a.html

Notice that he has his version of vg mounted the other direction? This plane cruises at around 60 mph.
Your right about the direction. I don't know how I screwed that up. I'll have to swing them around and retest. Mybe this weekend. I was disappointed with the original results. Maybe this will get it around 3%.
zpiloto is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aerodynamic auto designs, past and present, and their possible implications The Toecutter Automotive News, Articles and Products 12 02-10-2007 12:04 AM
Fuel economy links kickflipjr General Fuel Topics 0 11-27-2005 11:00 AM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.