 |
05-25-2006, 01:39 PM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 311
|
I think the roof is the only place you're going to see an improvement, since the rear window is at a greater than 11 degree angle, the boundry layer seperates from the window and causes greater drag. Or so says the things I've read and studied. =)
__________________
Anger is a gift!- Zack de la Rocha
|
|
|
05-25-2006, 05:56 PM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunger
I think the roof is the only place you're going to see an improvement, since the rear window is at a greater than 11 degree angle, the boundry layer seperates from the window and causes greater drag. Or so says the things I've read and studied. =)
|
That's kinda what I figured out. The gain not really worth the effort. Do you think that it might show a better improvement on a box vechile or mini van placed on the roof and sides on the rear end?
|
|
|
05-25-2006, 09:19 PM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 78
|
Definitely better on a boxier vehicle. You might try moving the VGs from the front fenders to the rear, just before the curve to the rear bumper and I use the term bumper loosely.
|
|
|
05-26-2006, 12:01 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
|
vg
Well I know a really boxy vehicle that shows greatly reduced MPG at higher speed that needs to be tested . . . my xB
|
|
|
05-26-2006, 05:38 PM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 292
|
a set of vortex generators
I like. If you were to sell a couple of those vortex generators to a fellow gassaver for his roofline, what would you charge him?
__________________
Current Stable
GasSaver: 2000 Honda Insight Silverstone w/AC 65+mpg
Track Terror: 2002 Honda S2000 Gran Prix White- lots of mods - 28mpg
Beater: 1988 Honda Civic DX Hatback - Stripped - 30mpg
RIP: 1996 Honda Civic LX 42mpg - you will be missed
https://tomauto.smugmug.com/Cars
|
|
|
05-26-2006, 07:39 PM
|
#6
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomauto
I like. If you were to sell a couple of those vortex generators to a fellow gassaver for his roofline, what would you charge him?
|
I don't have any left to sell. I have 2 left over and I would just give them to you if I had a bunch extra any way. If you want PM me your address and I can send you the paper pattern I used to make them. Just copy the pattern on to cardboard(for durability) then use the carboard cutout to copy on to the aluminium. Then cut out the pattern and bend with a pair of plyers. The whole shooting match was less then ten bucks at Lowes or Home Depot and took about 3 hours to make 45 of them. The aluminum was $6.00 for a ten foot roll and the 2 sided tape was under $5.00.
Quote:
I know it may be some trouble to try the test again, but your vortex generators might be too close to the trailing edge to be of benefit. On plane wings, the generators are closer to the front of the wing, to keep the air attached over the surface of the wing. You might want to try moving them forward a few inches, and see if there is any difference.
|
I don't think I'll test them again. It a pretty small gain. With such a small amount of data it really a toss up that they help at all on this car. The roofline is where they have them on the new cars and my cars rear end is rounded on the top and the sides so not much help there.
|
|
|
05-26-2006, 06:19 PM
|
#7
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanGeo
Well I know a really boxy vehicle that shows greatly reduced MPG at higher speed that needs to be tested . . . my xB
|
And my Tahoe!
|
|
|
05-26-2006, 06:59 PM
|
#8
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
|
I know it may be some trouble to try the test again, but your vortex generators might be too close to the trailing edge to be of benefit. On plane wings, the generators are closer to the front of the wing, to keep the air attached over the surface of the wing. You might want to try moving them forward a few inches, and see if there is any difference.
One thing that might be of interest is this quick doc on the generators, on the wikipedia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_generator), where it says they actually increase drag.
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 04:39 AM
|
#9
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
|
VG
Quote:
Originally Posted by katman
And my Tahoe!
|
Yeah but what percentage of your fuel consumption is to air drag compared to other drags of your vehicle? I know my xB gets better MPG at lower speeds and drops off over 40mph. Also think about AirTabs for $2.50 each in clear, black or white which have been wind tunnel tested.
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 06:59 AM
|
#10
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 78
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanGeo
Yeah but what percentage of your fuel consumption is to air drag compared to other drags of your vehicle? I know my xB gets better MPG at lower speeds and drops off over 40mph. Also think about AirTabs for $2.50 each in clear, black or white which have been wind tunnel tested.
|
I've thought about Airtabs in the past but then thought about making some and then people post other cool stuff and I start thinking about that and I procrastinate and get nothing done!
With the brush guard stuff on the Tahoe, which I don't want to take off, I know aerodynamic mods would help, but I'm having problems deciding what to use that won't change the looks too much. Clear Airtabs are a definite possibility. I've wondered about belly pans but are they effective on vehicles with large ground clearances? I never use the luggage rack so I could remove the cross bars. Then I could add a Ram Implosion Wing!
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|