The engine's response to HHO injection - Page 6 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 08-02-2008, 06:15 AM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 55
you guys sure know how to make a guy feel smarter and dumber at the same time!!
__________________


2001 Chevy S10 2.2 5 spd man
85,000 Miles
28-34 MPG with HHO
GasSavers_Ven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2008, 06:41 AM   #2
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,744
[Rant]

All I really want to see is someone take a normal, average vehicle like a Taurus or an Accord and enter it into the garage. Get a couple of months worth of good gaslog data entered, do some simple mods like grille block, air dam extension, and learn to drive it right, then experiment with HHO so everyone here can truly see what's going on and how it relates to a normal vehicle.

The science debates are fun, but in the end nothing beats a true, long term test where the rubber meets the road. So far we've been bombarded with people telling us that they installed HHO on their vehicle, and then made a 20 mile highway trip where their mileage was increased by 20 - 30%, and then we never hear from them again. I guess the MIB and the black unmarked helicopters chased them down and made sure this information never got released to the public. As it is right now, truly working HHO systems are like Chupacabra, grey aliens, Bigfoot, Yeti, and Elvis sightings. (I wonder if Elvis is running HHO in his Cadillac?)

We need to cut through the rumor, fuzzy logic, and political agendas. Just show us a vehicle with a charted "before HHO mileage", then install HHO and show us what you get afterwards. Its just that simple. I am trying to keep an open mind about HHO, and if someone can show that it actually works then I'll start building one next week.

I'm sure that there are many others on this forum that feel the same way I do.

-Jay

[/Rant]
__________________








Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2008, 07:04 AM   #3
Registered Member
 
flapdoodle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 183
My best was 30% increase in town, but I had to use an injection of methanol/water mix in addition to HHO. Every car will be different.

The biggest surprise was seeing the spark plugs get factory new looking in just a few minutes using HHO, and the cleaner exhaust.

You can see how things progressed here:
http://flapdoodledinghy.com/HHO_generator.html
flapdoodle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2008, 02:15 AM   #4
Registered Member
 
ZugyNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay2TheRescue View Post
[Rant]

All I really want to see is someone take a normal, average vehicle like a Taurus or an Accord and enter it into the garage. Get a couple of months worth of good gaslog data entered, do some simple mods like grille block, air dam extension, and learn to drive it right, then experiment with HHO so everyone here can truly see what's going on and how it relates to a normal vehicle.

The science debates are fun, but in the end nothing beats a true, long term test where the rubber meets the road. So far we've been bombarded with people telling us that they installed HHO on their vehicle, and then made a 20 mile highway trip where their mileage was increased by 20 - 30%, and then we never hear from them again. I guess the MIB and the black unmarked helicopters chased them down and made sure this information never got released to the public. As it is right now, truly working HHO systems are like Chupacabra, grey aliens, Bigfoot, Yeti, and Elvis sightings. (I wonder if Elvis is running HHO in his Cadillac?)

We need to cut through the rumor, fuzzy logic, and political agendas. Just show us a vehicle with a charted "before HHO mileage", then install HHO and show us what you get afterwards. Its just that simple. I am trying to keep an open mind about HHO, and if someone can show that it actually works then I'll start building one next week.

I'm sure that there are many others on this forum that feel the same way I do.

-Jay

[/Rant]
I like to nominate YOU as the person to do this. A lot of people are seeing results from HHO....maybe YOU will have to be the one to prove it to yourself and others like YOU?

Yea...some of the mpg testing is sort of flakey...but I believe the results are really there. But you must BELIEVE. Nothing wrong with faith-based science is there?

I used to be an UNBELIEVER until I saw my 7 to 10 % mpg gain from HHO. Now if I'd managed 20-30% or even 70-80%...I would have likely have disappeared too...I'd be out driving around!

Once you have that 40-50% gain...you are no longer a mere mortal...you are one with the gods?
__________________
Leading the perpetually ignorant and uninformed into the light of scientific knowledge. Did I really say that?

a new policy....I intend to ignore the nescient...a waste of time and energy.
ZugyNA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2008, 05:40 AM   #5
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZugyNA View Post
I like to nominate YOU as the person to do this. A lot of people are seeing results from HHO....maybe YOU will have to be the one to prove it to yourself and others like YOU?

Yea...some of the mpg testing is sort of flakey...but I believe the results are really there. But you must BELIEVE. Nothing wrong with faith-based science is there?

I used to be an UNBELIEVER until I saw my 7 to 10 % mpg gain from HHO. Now if I'd managed 20-30% or even 70-80%...I would have likely have disappeared too...I'd be out driving around!

Once you have that 40-50% gain...you are no longer a mere mortal...you are one with the gods?
Yeah, I have thought of building one anyway... I'm just not interested in rewiring all of my engine sensors to run on high concentrations of HHO. I'd probably build a conservative setup that produced small amounts of HHO so hopefully I might get some benefit of HHO without messing with the computer. I suspect that these vehicles with hacked computer systems will probably get better mileage, even with the HHO generator disconnected because they are leaning out the engine.

-Jay
__________________








Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2008, 03:07 PM   #6
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
If my engine burns 0.1gph then at 25% efficency of gasoline to electric energy would be 900 watt hours (9kwh/gallon) or 900 watts which is about 75 amps at 12 volts if the HHO production was 100% efficient to just get the engine to idle. It would be easier to spin the motor with an electric motor which I have that can handle about 150 amps at 12 volts. However the HHO will only be useful if it really makes the gasoline burn more efficiently.

You guys need to get a DC motor controller to operate the HHO generator so you can vary the voltage and thus the current to the generator to compensate for the temp and soda concentration variations as well as to regulate how much HHO you generate depending upon engine load.
JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 08:37 PM   #7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1
Do you guys think it's worth it to purchase a kit for this sort of thing? I own a chevy blazer (S10 gen 2) and it get's horrible gas mileage. I was thinking of purchasing this HHO Injection kit : http://hho-injection.net/ but I didn't know if it was a scam or what?
gingerbreadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 07:30 AM   #8
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 63
Send a message via MSN to JohnNeiferd
That's a scam. They charge you a lot of money just to tell you how to build it, they don't even build a unit for you. If your interested in experimenting with hydrogen generators, then I would suggest http://www.hhoforums.com/ . No scammers or anything there, just people genuinely interested in hydrogen generators. Lots of good information too, and you can easily build a hydrogen generator for under $30. Will it give you better fuel economy? I don't know, most people say no, but I can guarantee any self-built unit will produce more than a $100 unit purchased online.
__________________
1987 Honda Civic 1500


1992 Chevrolet Lumina Euro
JohnNeiferd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 07:49 AM   #9
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 280
I wish I had more freetime so I could experiment for you. Once I get my 2nd car then I'll work getting Megasquirt working on the truck. I know how far my best driving techniques can get me on that. I'm hoping with Megasquirt I can lean it out a bit and get much better control. By the time that's working and tuned with my little free time it'll probably be 6+ months.

Then maybe I can try the tried and true 7 cells in series for ~2v each using KOH. It sounds like if it works as described in enhancing the burn and based on the MIT study that being able to burn more complete and ability to lean further are the main helps. In my opinion the goal of a vehicle driveline should be HP on demand. That's why EVs are more efficient, at 50MPH you're using the exact 20HP you need to use, if you want to accelerate you give more power and now you're putting out 40HP. No waste. If using HHO I can lean to 25:1, or basically give half the gasoline and produce about half the power, then that's awesome for cruise and then I can inject extra gasoline for more power as need up to 12:1. Power on demand.

Of course the speed at which HHO burns is scary to me, not a good thing. Our engines are designed for slow burning fuel, we have a lot of advance ignition and compression and any lower octane fuel (or faster burning) will cause pinging.

About the compression engine, is there a worry of HHO compression igniting? That is will it ping just from heat and pressure even if I retard my ignition?

The other main thing I've been itching to try (which is much harder) is adding directly injected liquid water at or just after TDC of ignition. I've seen the Crower cycle and worry about a steam cycle on it's own, but if I can inject water just after flame is starting to propogate downward (so I won't extinguish it), I think steam explossion and lowering of temperature would help with efficiency and emissions.
itjstagame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 07:35 PM   #10
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
I was talking to a guy yesterday about the whole HHO generator thing available at a web site and he kept saying this thing puts out hydrogen like crazy using pulsed high voltage 20,000 volts but it only uses 0.1 amps - he didn't realize that it was 2000 watts of power he was talking about - he just kept saying 0.1 amps is all it takes like it was a tiny amount of power and you can run your car on water using this HHO generator.
JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How often do you change your manual transmission fluid? Peakster General Maintenance and Repair 32 11-27-2012 03:38 PM
Incorrect Milage Calcuatlion PatM Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 07-17-2009 07:21 PM
Missing Fuelup jmonty Fuelly Web Support and Community News 3 05-27-2009 04:10 AM
Air scoop for mpg? ZugyNA Experiments, Modifications and DIY 10 12-05-2007 09:40 AM
BIG car Andy-Paul Transmissions and Running Gear 30 10-24-2007 01:25 PM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.