 |
|
09-25-2006, 08:30 PM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
|
The only problem I can think of is efficiency. According to wikipedia (maybe?) the best (small) permanent magnet generators are ~60% efficient while most new alternators are ~55% efficient (bosch PR), and circa 2004, ~70% efficiency for the best bosch versions. Since the energy you gain from the generator spinning must result in some proportional increase in drag, I'm not sure it would help with auto efficiency at all. I think the best bet would be minimizing electrical consumption, disconnecting the alt, dropping in a couple deep cycle LA batts, and using the solar panel as much as possible.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
11-01-2006, 04:11 AM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
|
Somehow I missed this thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by omgwtfbyobbq
The only problem I can think of is efficiency. According to wikipedia (maybe?) the best (small) permanent magnet generators are ~60% efficient while most new alternators are ~55% efficient (bosch PR), and circa 2004, ~70% efficiency for the best bosch versions.
|
Can you point to a source for that info? Wikipedia (all of which is true, btw) claims 90% alternator efficiency:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alterna...harging_system
|
|
|
11-01-2006, 02:17 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
|
From that same page
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
In comparison, the best permanent magnet generators, such as those used for bicycle lighting systems, achieve an efficiency of around only 60%.
|
In terms of alternator efficiency, the conversion of mechanical to electrical may be very efficient, but it still goes into charging a battery which loses some efficiency, the laternator may only reach peak efficiency at a certain engine speed, so overall efficiency may be mucn lower than peak efficiency, etc... The alt efficiency clip was based off this blurb on diesel alternators. I'm guessing normal auto alts are the same or worse in terms of efficiency. 100% pure truth.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
09-25-2006, 08:39 PM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 118
|
before everyone here tells you not to do it.
just go freaking do it.
then tell us how it works out!
but seriously tho, only charging while moving etc....
the ram air will mess up your aerodynamics....
run it like this.... Put it in your back bumper, with a hole cutt for the fan, whatever u use to spin. make a scoop to it. THEN, have it so that it will capture the exhaust gas blowing onto it, as well as, the air you are generating while the car is moving.
__________________
Order some golf shoes, otherwise we might never make it out of this place alive.
|
|
|
11-08-2006, 07:28 AM
|
#6
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 238
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
before everyone here tells you not to do it.
just go freaking do it.
then tell us how it works out!
but seriously tho, only charging while moving etc....
the ram air will mess up your aerodynamics....
run it like this.... Put it in your back bumper, with a hole cutt for the fan, whatever u use to spin. make a scoop to it. THEN, have it so that it will capture the exhaust gas blowing onto it, as well as, the air you are generating while the car is moving.
|
Hmmm.... Isn't this called a turbo turbine???
|
|
|
09-25-2006, 08:59 PM
|
#7
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 265
|
I would think your idea would just be trading direct alternator drag on the engine (the normal case), for aerodynamic drag on the car itself (since I would think the wind ram would cause additional aerodynamic drag, proportional to the power generated). This isn't exactly a win.
However, if you add an active shutter system (at the grill, in front of your "ram"), you could then use the system like this:
1) When the car is tuned off or stopped, the shutter opens, and therefore any wind blowing into the grill will generate some electrical power. If you live in a windy area, this would be a great way to top off a deep-cycle battery when you park somewhere.
2) And you might want the shutters to also open, when the break lights come on (i.e. when you step on the breaks, even very gently). This will allow you to usefully use the aerodynamic drag this "ram" produces to assist with breaking (and generate a little electrical power in the bargain).
3) If you don't have any other charging circuit (i.e. you have disconnected the main alternator of the car), and the battery is getting low, you might want an override switch to open the shutter and therefore have your ram start charging things (albeit at the cost of more aerodynamic drag, while charging).
4) At all other times, I would leave the shutter closed (this system turned off), to avoid the aerodynamic drag on the car.
NOTE: I don't see any reason you couldn't do both this and a solar panel. If you used deep cycle batteries, the combo might very well let you disconnect the normal alternator from your car, thereby lowering that electrical drag on the car. You would then be running mostly off of the deep cycle battery (or batteries), with the solar and wind power (and your idea is essentially a clever way to hide a wind turbine in your car) when you are parking. And you would even get a little "while you are driving" assist from the solar cell (if the sun was out), and the wind ram (if/when you are slowing down or stopped).
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 02:14 AM
|
#8
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
|
not enough air flow to make any power - small boat generators I have worked with have three 2 foot radius blades and only produce 10-15 amps in 20-25 mph winds . . . maybe at higher speeds with ducted air flow would work . . . extra battery means extra weight
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 04:23 AM
|
#9
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanGeo
extra battery means extra weight
|
I'm thinking that if it's remotely possible, that it would be a supplement to the alternator. If it proves effective, a clutch mechanism similar to that of the magnetic A/C engagement, could cut the load from the alternator and use the wind. If this second step proves effective, a simple electronic system could be setup to engage/disengage the clutch, based on electrical load/wind generation.
No idea is too crazy here
Scientific testing can only determine effectiveness.
RH77
__________________
|
|
|
09-26-2006, 06:56 AM
|
#10
|
Driving on E
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
|
It would work wonderfully at highway speeds IMHO, but what about city driving?
I still think that finding a way to do this with the exhaust gases would be the best bet. If you could rig it up to capture both exhaust and wind that would be the best.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|