Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Peters
I hate to offend, but I find it hard to believe the mileage some people claim. Not that I disbelieve, just that my skepticism cuts in whenever people make up their own experiments.
|
The mileage claimed isn't based on testing procedure etc. - It's based on tank to tank fills
Which, in itself, is at the whim of things like pump error (which is why it's recommended to fill at the same pump every time and fill in the consistent manner).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Peters
There *do* exist criteria for true fuel consumption tests. I'd like it if people were at least asked to use these before posting.
|
Check out some of the stickies in the experiments section
http://www.gassavers.org/showthread.php?t=1155
It's recommended that some form of method be taken for testing procedures (and several well written experiments actually do follow this or similar procedure). This attempts to control some variables while presenting characteristics (such as wind and temperature) that question validity. In my opinion, and I'm one that semi-frequently reads peer reviewed papers et. al., data like this loses some credibility when factors that could throw off results are not mentioned.
But of course, and lastly,
on road testing does not provide results. On road testing must be taken as anecdotal data. In the end, go with what works for you - but don't take other people's data as evidence. That's not to say reliable members are sources of incredulous data - just that your mileage may vary