 JanGeo map 03-24-2006, 02:00 AM
|
03-23-2006, 09:12 AM
|
#1
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,209
|
Re: hi ryland (welcome to the
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
hi ryland (welcome to the site).
that's the first bit of evidence i've heard in favour of the restrictor.
if turbulence from the throttle plate is a fuel efficiency drawback in throttle bodies, i wonder why carmakers don't use a different design, like a variable diameter aperature rather than a butterfly valve.
|
I once wondered about an aperture style wastegate, but it would be expensive to create.
If turbulence from the throttle plate is a drawback, then the claims from devices like the Turbonator are definately bunk, as these types of devices do just that - create turbulence.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|