08-08-2007, 09:03 AM
|
#11
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,779
|
veloman -
Quote:
Originally Posted by veloman
From my experience in road cycling, accelerating to a high speed and coasting back to a low speed and repeating is the best way to have a horrible average speed and waste TONS of energy. I can't see how it would improve fuel economy in any way. BUT, I've never tried it, so maybe you guys are right.
When you change velocity, that requires additional power. I would think it's far better to maintain steady speed/power levels.
And how practical is it anyway? Are you going to yo-yo down the road in traffic? Dip to 45mph on the interstate and get run over? lol
|
I don't think you can compare road cycling to P&G. For MPG competition, P&G is a proven technique. There is no debate on the subject.
I think that steady state mostly holds true for speeds at or below 35 MPH, where the car doesn't have to fight aerodynamic friction.
What are the racing techniques in those super-aero enclosed recumbent bikes?
CarloSW2
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|