|
|
03-24-2009, 08:57 AM
|
#31
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,139
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow
NovaResource keeps posting about a "10mpg" improvement as if it's some crazy unattainable number, but it's only 31%. It's certainly worthwhile and certainly significant, but it's not some crazy pie-in-the-sky achievement. I suppose it would be for a Chevy Nova, though.
|
I getcha. You meant that 31% isn't "obviously brain dead", not that it isn't appreciable. I guess that sort of thing's a bit subjective, hence the disagreements.
__________________
__________________
Main Entry: co de pen dence - see codependency
co de pen den cy
Pronunciation: \kō-di-ˈpen-dən(t)-sē\
Function: noun
Date: 1979
: a psychological condition or a relationship in which a person is controlled or manipulated by another who is affected with a pathological condition (as an addiction to alcohol or heroin) ; broadly : dependence on the needs of or control by another
|
|
|
03-24-2009, 09:00 AM
|
#32
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,831
|
I just have a hard time with someone saying that someone elses experiment isn't good enough when they haven't conducted their own.
are their flaws in his findings? too many variables? maybe but he has some sort of data. better than the man shouting from the side lines. as far as the variables, I left my dyno in my other pants and my wind tunnel was lost at the cleaners. there are always going to be variables. a short run (less than 100 miles) isn't the best test track to use because of the distance but at least he did a test. more than the rest can say.
if you want to say that his test isn't good enough, that's fine. I will be waiting in great anticipation for the results on your test.
__________________
__________________
Be the change you wish to see in the world
--Mahatma Gandhi
|
|
|
03-24-2009, 09:00 AM
|
#33
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximilian
I getcha. You meant that 31% isn't "obviously brain dead", not that it isn't appreciable. I guess that sort of thing's a bit subjective, hence the disagreements.
|
Yup. In computer programming terms: It passes a sanity check.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
|
|
|
03-24-2009, 09:01 AM
|
#34
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 245
Country: United States
|
philip: I see in first pic for the hot air your Sg showing 139. What readings did you get with the cold air intake??
__________________
"Sylvie" 2000 Honda Insight 5 Speed
|
|
|
03-24-2009, 09:01 AM
|
#35
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,139
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow
Yup. In computer programming terms: It passes a sanity check.
|
Perfect way of putting it. Jealous I didn't!
__________________
Main Entry: co de pen dence - see codependency
co de pen den cy
Pronunciation: \kō-di-ˈpen-dən(t)-sē\
Function: noun
Date: 1979
: a psychological condition or a relationship in which a person is controlled or manipulated by another who is affected with a pathological condition (as an addiction to alcohol or heroin) ; broadly : dependence on the needs of or control by another
|
|
|
03-24-2009, 09:07 AM
|
#36
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximilian
Is anybody arguing that WAI has been definitively proved? That's not even the question I really care about at the moment. "Should I bother giving it a shot?" is more my focus.
|
I say, yes, give it a shot. Try it over the long haul but also go back to the standard intake and see if the increase (or decrease) goes back. Just try to keep the test free from other variables if possible.
|
|
|
03-24-2009, 09:12 AM
|
#37
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NovaResource
I say, yes, give it a shot. Try it over the long haul but also go back to the standard intake and see if the increase (or decrease) goes back. Just try to keep the test free from other variables if possible.
|
That right there is A-B-A testing, which is exactly what is needed.
To continue without additional data might be a little like this:
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
|
|
|
03-24-2009, 09:15 AM
|
#38
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BEEF
I just have a hard time with someone saying that someone elses experiment isn't good enough when they haven't conducted their own.
|
You don't need to conduct your own experiment to know when another is flawed. But if you want me to, I will conduct my own. I'll use this week as the base line of a stock intake. Then I will fill-up on Friday like I usually do and remove the air horn from the air-cleaner assembly to outside the engine compartment. That way it will take in just warm engine-compartment air and we'll see what happend next week. But I can tell you now even my test will be flawed but I will do my best to keep the variables as few as possible. This should work since I only use my car for work now and my daily commute is the same week to week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BEEF
I will be waiting in great anticipation for the results on your test.
|
So will I.
|
|
|
03-24-2009, 09:22 AM
|
#39
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,831
|
remember friend, I have been here almost a year and have gas logs that have over 15,000 miles in them. I have done my fair share of experimentation and sharing with the group (positive sharing). If I recall correctly, didn't you shoot him down immediately saying his experiment was BS? that doesn't sound like positive anything.
I have seen 45% above EPA in my car so I know that the WAI works and many others have seen similar success. I am still running almost 35% over EPA during the winter time. Oh yea, it's an automatic trans too.
do what you please, it doesn't matter to me. this thread has already told me what I need to know about you.
have fun with your 5% increase. maybe you should work on your numbers before criticizing other.
__________________
Be the change you wish to see in the world
--Mahatma Gandhi
|
|
|
03-24-2009, 09:22 AM
|
#40
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,139
Country: United States
|
I figured out another reason WAI feels less unlikely (double negative intentional) than one of those vortex air intakes: a downside. Those scam products usually claim all upside. WAI advocates freely admit that max hp will suffer. Again, doesn't prove anything one way or the other.
__________________
__________________
Main Entry: co de pen dence - see codependency
co de pen den cy
Pronunciation: \kō-di-ˈpen-dən(t)-sē\
Function: noun
Date: 1979
: a psychological condition or a relationship in which a person is controlled or manipulated by another who is affected with a pathological condition (as an addiction to alcohol or heroin) ; broadly : dependence on the needs of or control by another
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:52 AM.