Quote:
Originally Posted by tradosaurus
You stated in the first post that
So you used these mysterious substances and implemented your idea.
All I'm asking is that you send a sample of what you used to one of the members here to try out.
P.S. I can be bought at a price.
|
Ah! If only it were that simple! Here I am, changing the gasoline chemistry (to impede the flame front velocity a bit) and you want a sample of "this substance"? So you can ...?
"Try out"? I fail to see your reasoning... If member A gets a big improvement, what does (s)he do with this info? Proclaim to the rest of the group (s)he approves of these "claims" (which I have carefully avoided making)? I see... credibility is the name of this game. But, the concept once gone, means I have lost it because the initial investment is not there. You see, "free" is also "throw away". If you have invested in something, you tend to protect this investment.
My entire aim is to fight back against the great gas pump gouge with a concept which stretches the interval between pumpings. I just happened to hit on a substance which altered the chain-of-events in the air-fuel-ignition sequence.
Prior to computerized ignition systems (points & capacitor days), I had to power time for optimum efficiency; this was a fixed system. Not very flexible; ie, it was compromising. With the introduction of the oxygen sensor, I now had the perfect system ... always power timing. OBD-ll saved the day!
Hint: Take a chance & try it out. Then, you can offer your endorsement ... or not.
Can you see my dilemma? There are other <gassavers...> members here which were on yesteryears <MPGResearch>. They took a chance - you can ask them about their approvals. A sample is not what this is about; a conceptual change in chemistry is ....
Ted Hart ( a ScanGauge ll supporter)
__________________