Quote:
Originally Posted by Fourthbean
I would agree with your statement, however I have not realized any gains in my fuel economy after removing my bolted on fan (not even clutch driven).
Could be other factors involved.
On that note I don't know that I can say one thing has increased my economy other than using pulse and glide. I have tried removing my fan, put in a grill block, but the biggest thing seems to be simply how I drive. Maybe I need to spend some more time messing around. Maybe my car has too many variables with it's mechanical ignition and carburetor to accurately see the difference between different mods.
|
I had a '65 Belair with 250 6 & auto that got around 25 mpg...no mods. I drove it pretty easy though.
Things that might work?
http://www.eagle-research.com/fuelsav/ecarb.html
http://fueleconomytips.com/2005/11/0...one-generator/
http://fueleconomytips.com/2007/04/2...thods/#more-72
Vacuum gauge?
PCV jar?
E3 or Halo plugs?
a quote....
"Alright you guys, I realize that I'm and old fart but I experimented with
magnets and carbureted engines 25 years ago. I got fantastic results. I used a
1980 GMC 4X4. It had a 350CI with an auto trans. Obviously not a gas saver. I
hooked up a 1 quart container to the fuel pump. I carefully measured the
distance while trying to conserve fuel. I added 1 cow magnet and increased the
distance by 6 blocks. Added 2 magnets and added more distance. With 3 magnets
all faced the same direction I got an extra mile. I still don't know what
effected the gasoline but it works."
Assuming 15 mpg highway....this works out to 19 mpg ...or a 26% gain.
Cow magnets are a different type than the typical neo magnet...S pole should be placed towards the engine...same as fuel flow direction.