yet another WAI experiment - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-24-2009, 08:07 AM   #1
Registered Member
 
GasSavers_BEEF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,831
yet another WAI experiment

my results:

+2.7475%

the experiment: 6 tanks of no less than 400 miles each alternating from stock to WAI. I couldn't go completely back to stock. I have two opening in my airbox that I can chose from. close off one and it is WAI, close off the other and it is close to stock. my stock IAT readings were about 5 degrees above ambient. my "simulated stock" readings were 17ish degrees above ambient. keep that in mind.

I do not have a data logger so all of this had to be taken by hand. the weather data came from www.wunderground.com (thanks to theholycow for the web site).

this big blue number means nothing without backup so here that is as well:



and pretty graph



all of this data can be seen in my gas log.

explinations and theories:

the first two tanks (I think) were during winter gas and thus the lower numbers. the entire run was over 2500 miles using over 70 gallons of fuel and took approximately 2 mos and 10 days. the IAT numbers were recorded at the end of each run (runs were between 20 and 30 miles on average).

so why was the net gain not better? part of it has to do with the temperature delta. at only 50 degrees (maybe 55) it isn't as large as most and the fact that my IAT only saw an average high in the mid 140s vs others that constantly run 180s.

is it worth doing? my driving was not different for this experiment and the power difference was only really noticeable on hard takeoffs from stoplights (if you question this, search GUNNING IT FOR FE). the actual cost of the setup was around $10 so the expense was minimal.

am I happy with the results? no and yes at the same time. I wish the percentage was higher but at the same time, it is a consistant increase as evident by my numbers and cheesy graph.

hopefully this isn't too much information at one time. and I am in no way saying that the WAI is a success or a dud as it depends on the vehicle and the drivers application along with other factors. I think it has been a success for my application and hopefully this will encourage others to experiment.

if anyone wants more data, I have each run in a rather lengthy excel spread sheet.

thanks for reading
__________________
Be the change you wish to see in the world
--Mahatma Gandhi



GasSavers_BEEF is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Average mpg + tracked km even though fuel-ups marked as missed Pelle Fuelly Web Support and Community News 14 03-04-2012 03:10 AM
Incorrect mileage calculation? tonedepear Fuelly Web Support and Community News 6 04-04-2011 12:04 AM
new member dirtygst Introduce Yourself - New member Welcome 13 03-31-2009 06:46 AM
No EPA Est for 2007 Chrysler Town & Country jklaiber Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 08-23-2008 12:15 AM
Readers driven to...save on gas bowtieguy Automotive News, Articles and Products 3 07-07-2008 03:51 AM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
No Threads to Display.
» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.