|
|
01-24-2014, 05:56 AM
|
#11
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 12
Country: United States
|
What kind of mpg are you getting with the 3.7. I have the 3.5 eco-boost, and not yet impressed with the gas mileage, but I just got it.
__________________
|
|
|
01-24-2014, 06:00 AM
|
#12
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 12
Country: United States
|
3.7 or 3.5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sludgy
I had a powerstoke 6.0 for a long time. Hated it, the mileage sucked. My 2011 gas F150 3.7 V6 gets better mileage.
|
What kind of gas mileage are you getting with the 3.7? I have the 3.5 Eco-boost, and am not yet impressed with the gas mileage.
__________________
|
|
|
01-24-2014, 06:35 AM
|
#13
|
Site Team / Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,739
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejstrickland
I just purchased a new 2013 F-150 ecoboost 3.5 twin turbo truck, and have been driving it like an old lady. So far I am not able to get above 14.6 mpg. Can someone give me insight about this? It was a demo and has 6000 miles on it. Will I eventually get better gas mileage, or is there something I can do to improve the mpg? HELP.
|
I know driving my truck, driving like an old lady (super gradual acceleration) causes it to lag in lower gears longer and ultimately results in lower economy. My best results are when I give it 25%-35% throttle to accelerate. This way you don't spend an extended period in lower gears.
|
|
|
01-24-2014, 08:09 AM
|
#14
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 12
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay2TheRescue
I know driving my truck, driving like an old lady (super gradual acceleration) causes it to lag in lower gears longer and ultimately results in lower economy. My best results are when I give it 25%-35% throttle to accelerate. This way you don't spend an extended period in lower gears.
|
Thank you very much. I will try it. I am considering eventually looking into getting a chip for it. I hear that may also improve gas mileage as well.
|
|
|
01-24-2014, 09:44 AM
|
#15
|
Site Team / Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,739
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
|
I'd advise against it. Aftermarket chips may advertise better mileage, but almost never deliver. They're designed for the performance market with little, if any thought as to how the economy is effected.
|
|
|
01-24-2014, 11:36 AM
|
#16
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 302
Country: United States
Location: Nebraska
|
If the aftermarket chips affect emissions, they are probably illegal under EPA rules. You may not care, but if your area does any sort of emissions check you might have problems.
You might also look around in the "Browse Vehicles" part of this site - Fuelly - and see what people are actually reporting for fuel mileage. My personal experience with full-sized pickups is that you will likely get low teens for fuel mileage in the city, and high teens on the highway.
|
|
|
01-24-2014, 03:38 PM
|
#17
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,386
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Mid Wales
|
Don't all vehicles go through an annual test like in the UK? They check everything from seatbelts to chips in the windscreen, from brakes to tyre tread, and emissions too.
|
|
|
01-24-2014, 03:51 PM
|
#18
|
Site Team / Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,739
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
|
In the US whether or not a vehicle gets an annual inspection, and what is checked in that inspection is up to the individual states. Some states require no inspections. Some require safety only, and some require safety & emissions.
|
|
|
01-24-2014, 04:32 PM
|
#19
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 111
Country: United States
Location: Houston, Tx
|
Have heard the EcoBoost motor takes 10K miles to 'break in' so hang in there - also wouldn't a chip void the warranty ?
signed safety & emissions test here in Houston
__________________
|
|
|
01-24-2014, 04:38 PM
|
#20
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 12
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay2TheRescue
I'd advise against it. Aftermarket chips may advertise better mileage, but almost never deliver. They're designed for the performance market with little, if any thought as to how the economy is effected.
|
I appreciate the input. I will definitely speak to the dealership before doing anything like that.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:35 AM.