|
04-15-2008, 07:49 PM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,111
Country: United States
|
What would you choose?
I'm kinda stuck between two cars. I want manual so I can do some hypermiling when I'm not driving around like a jerk ***(yeah, I admit it).
I've got the 2008 Civic Si. I like that it's small, gets alright mileage and it's a fun little car to drive around.
On the other hand I've got the 2008 Mustang Convertible V6. The weather here is PERFECT for a convertible and I strongly prefer RWD and good torque, something the Civic doesn't have much of.
The Civic takes Premium but gets 21/29 while the Mustang takes regular and gets 17/26.
I've test driven almost every car on the market and only really like these two cars. I was unhappy with the normal Civic, Yaris, Corolla, Mazda3, ALL GM cars and the Focus was a joke. If it was cheaper the RAV4 V6 AWD or the Highlander Hybrid 4WD-i would be on the list.
__________________
__________________
- Kyle
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 08:18 PM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,460
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkjones96
I'm kinda stuck between two cars. I want manual so I can do some hypermiling when I'm not driving around like a jerk ***(yeah, I admit it).
I've got the 2008 Civic Si. I like that it's small, gets alright mileage and it's a fun little car to drive around.
On the other hand I've got the 2008 Mustang Convertible V6. The weather here is PERFECT for a convertible and I strongly prefer RWD and good torque, something the Civic doesn't have much of.
The Civic takes Premium but gets 21/29 while the Mustang takes regular and gets 17/26.
I've test driven almost every car on the market and only really like these two cars. I was unhappy with the normal Civic, Yaris, Corolla, Mazda3, ALL GM cars and the Focus was a joke. If it was cheaper the RAV4 V6 AWD or the Highlander Hybrid 4WD-i would be on the list.
|
I would chose the civic...in fact bothe cars are about equal in accelaration...Plus you can't go wrong with Honda..
If you want you can get a 2008 v6 camry, it's fast if not faster than these 2 cars, takes regular(87), and gets 19 city and 28 hwy...
__________________
__________________
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 11:39 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 278
Country: United States
Location: CT
|
Mustang all the way... I can't stand FWD, plus the fact it takes regular, plus the good low end torque... I imagine that if you try hard, you can easily get 30mpg out of the 'stang.
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 08:26 AM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Country: United States
|
I keep the civic and invest in K-pro.
That's just me though. Less matience would be the ultamate deicider for me.
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 03:25 PM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 447
Country: United States
|
The civic is faster, and better mpg. I have the older slower 2002 civic si, and I love it! the only thing better would be that 40 HP the 06 and up models have. But that also is keeping me in the 30s MPG wise. And Im not always driving like I should!
__________________
|
|
|
04-16-2008, 05:25 PM
|
#6
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 44
Country: United States
|
Definitely the Civic.
__________________
|
|
|
04-17-2008, 08:14 PM
|
#7
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 742
Country: United States
Location: Columbus, IN, USA
|
damn kyle, you really know how to pick hard ones...mustang definitely gets mondo points for RWD but it's a ford and a new ford at that. I say you get a 22r w58 celica :-p eh I guess get the civic.
__________________
-Russell
1991 Toyota Pickup 22R-E 2.4 I4/5 speed
1990 Toyota Cressida 7M-GE 3.0 I6/5-speed manual
mechanic, carpenter, stagehand, rigger, and know-it-all smartass
"You don't get to judge me for how I fix what you break"
|
|
|
04-17-2008, 09:45 PM
|
#8
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,111
Country: United States
|
Yeah, it's not exactly easy.
The Mustang is pretty much everything I want in a car, RWD(never owned FWD in my life), 12-valve 6 cylinder, convertible with a decent sound system and a cramped back seat nobody will want to use.
The Civic just seems like it'd be a fun little car to fart around in and if I didn't live at 5800ft I could probably live with the non-Si performance and therefore could get a car that's rated in the 30's and it'd be an easy decision from there.
It's just so weird. The Civic is almost everything I hate in a car but something draws me to it. I think it's the feeling of revving an engine out to its 8k redline.
__________________
- Kyle
|
|
|
04-18-2008, 05:22 AM
|
#9
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 557
Country: United States
|
Ruh-roh! "5,800ft".... Do you have winter?
The 'usta might need some sandbags in the trunk as well as four true snow tires to match the winter capabilities of the Civet with four snow tires.
Me? I'm lazy, I'd take an automatic almost any day. A convertible...well, it's better than being saddled with a sunroof. The Honda will be more practical with a hatch and folding rear seat for the bulkier objects that just won't fit in or on the Muskrat.
A tough choice, but I'd chose the Ford from that limited pool of only two options.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
|