What can I do? - Page 5 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 08-12-2009, 11:08 PM   #41
Registered Member
 
shatto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 345
Country: United States
Play around with your cruising speed.
A V8 ought to be at 2,000 RPM somewhere around 62 to 65 MPH.
Somewhere around 65 MPH seems to be where vehicles are made to cruise.

Set the cruise control, plant your feet on the floor and enjoy all those frantic folks roaring past on your left. As you get your best mileage.

AND
*Disconnect the front hubs.
*And, get highway tires. Keep the knobby ones for actual off-road driving.
*Switch all your lubricants to synthetic.
__________________

__________________
I use and talk about, but don't sell Amsoil.
Who is shatto?
06 4.7 Tundra replaced a 98 Dakota 3.9.
623,000 miles on original engine and transmission, using Amsoil by-pass filters and lubrication.
+Everybody knows something you don't know.
+Artists prove truth can be in forms you don't understand.

Low-Risk Option Trader
Retired Pro-Hunter featured in; 'African Hunter', by James R. Mellon III. and listed in; Rowland Ward's Records of Big Game.
shatto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 11:27 AM   #42
Registered Member
 
Greeen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 15
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by shatto View Post
Play around with your cruising speed.
A V8 ought to be at 2,000 RPM somewhere around 62 to 65 MPH.
Somewhere around 65 MPH seems to be where vehicles are made to cruise.

Set the cruise control, plant your feet on the floor and enjoy all those frantic folks roaring past on your left. As you get your best mileage.

AND
*Disconnect the front hubs.
*And, get highway tires. Keep the knobby ones for actual off-road driving.
*Switch all your lubricants to synthetic.
That is one thing I do already have is synthetic fluids, I put Ams Oil in everything I own. What do you mean by disconnect my front hubs? It has electronic hubs for the 4x4.

Maybe I should just drive my vette more often, I drove it from Wisconsin to Texas and averaged 27.5 mpg with the cruise at 74, which I think is not bad for a 400hp car.
__________________

__________________
2003 F150 Supercrew
2006 Corvette (the gas saver)
2001 Mustang GT
Greeen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2009, 12:50 AM   #43
Registered Member
 
shatto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 345
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greeen View Post
That is one thing I do already have is synthetic fluids, I put Ams Oil in everything I own. What do you mean by disconnect my front hubs? It has electronic hubs for the 4x4.

Maybe I should just drive my vette more often, I drove it from Wisconsin to Texas and averaged 27.5 mpg with the cruise at 74, which I think is not bad for a 400hp car.
When your electronic hubs are 'OFF' I presume, and I presume because back in my day you got your butt out and turned the dial on the Warn Hubs to do the job, that disconnects the wheels from the axle. The axles do not turn the differential, universal joints, transfer case gears and so the engine doesn't have to use a bunch of gas to overcome all that resistance.
__________________
I use and talk about, but don't sell Amsoil.
Who is shatto?
06 4.7 Tundra replaced a 98 Dakota 3.9.
623,000 miles on original engine and transmission, using Amsoil by-pass filters and lubrication.
+Everybody knows something you don't know.
+Artists prove truth can be in forms you don't understand.

Low-Risk Option Trader
Retired Pro-Hunter featured in; 'African Hunter', by James R. Mellon III. and listed in; Rowland Ward's Records of Big Game.
shatto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2009, 03:50 PM   #44
Registered Member
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,873
Country: United States
Location: orlando, florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by theclencher View Post
Are you trolling or are you serious?
i'm w/ ya clencher. depending on the weight of the load, a 4cyl can tow well enough, especially w/ a 5 speed.

according to this http://www.fordf150.net/specs/04ranger.php, the AT can tow more than the MT on a 4 cyl ranger?
bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2009, 04:05 PM   #45
Site Team / Moderator
 
Jay2TheRescue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,739
Country: United States
Location: Northern Virginia
On my trucks I run highway tires, and always have (I like my smooth, quiet, comfortable ride), and I run synthetic fluids. I usually travel within 5 MPH of the speed limit (And in light traffic I'm going 5 MPH under). At 65 MPH I'm usually turning about 1,800 to 1,900 RPM.
__________________








Jay2TheRescue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2009, 04:11 PM   #46
Registered Member
 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
Send a message via ICQ to theholycow Send a message via AIM to theholycow Send a message via MSN to theholycow Send a message via Yahoo to theholycow
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowtieguy View Post
i'm w/ ya clencher. depending on the weight of the load, a 4cyl can tow well enough, especially w/ a 5 speed.
Heavy towing doesn't require a lot of power, contrary to popular belief; if you don't have enough power, you'll just go slower, no problem. It does, however, require an appropriately sized and weighted vehicle with appropriate brakes (despite whatever brakes may exist on the trailer). There's probably no 4 cylinder vehicle that is legal or safe in the US to tow my 26 foot camper, for example.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2009, 12:33 AM   #47
Registered Member
 
theclencher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 542
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowtieguy View Post
i'm w/ ya clencher. depending on the weight of the load, a 4cyl can tow well enough, especially w/ a 5 speed.

according to this http://www.fordf150.net/specs/04ranger.php, the AT can tow more than the MT on a 4 cyl ranger?
I don't see where he mentioned what was being towed... I was responding to the little inferiority complex remark about not be willing to be seen in a 4 banger. Fer stupid.
__________________
Tempo/Topaz:
Old EPA 23/33/27
New EPA 21/30/24

F150:
New EPA12/14/17

theclencher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2009, 05:07 AM   #48
Registered Member
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,873
Country: United States
Location: orlando, florida
well, you know how that can be an excuse. ya know, "i might need to tow something, sometime."

obviously, unless a load of sod or concrete is being towed, most 4 cyl can fill the need.
bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2009, 05:10 AM   #49
Registered Member
 
bowtieguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,873
Country: United States
Location: orlando, florida
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greeen View Post
I was looking more for modifications. I'm pretty sure I would hate myself if I had to drive little 4 banger everyday, plus I do have a few trailers I pull on occasion.
found it
bowtieguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2009, 06:14 AM   #50
Senior Member
 
Mayhim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 179
Country: United States
I got a scangauge for use in my truck. It doesn't help as much as I would like (nothing is magic) but it helps me to improve my driving techniques.

While a new fuel efficient vehicle would be hard to make pay for itself, I did just that. At the height of the gas price rise I found an '89 Honda CRX and got it for $875. The money I saved getting 40mpg over the 10 mpg in my V10 Super Duty has more than paid for the price of the car, maintenance, and body work/paint. Add in insurance and maybe not, but it's a lot easier to find a parking spot for it. It does take a while to get into the little-car thing, but if you want good mileage a truck really doesn't do that. I guess it's all in how much gas you want to save...

Driving conservatively I get 40-41 mpgs. Last tank I tried semi-rigorous DFCO (deceleration fuel cut off) and got 47.25 mpg. Sure beats the 10mpg of the truck. It even beats the 20mpg I get out of my automatic '98 Z28.
__________________

Mayhim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Fuelly Android Apps
No Threads to Display.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.