 Bill in Houston Yep! 06-22-2007, 12:27 PM
|
06-23-2007, 06:45 AM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
|
I know that neighborhood. Here's the house of a friend that lives there:
|
|
|
06-24-2007, 08:28 AM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 358
|
Hmm, there must be a differnt style here in the states. I looked it up in a book at work yesterday and it said 1.1L 2 cylinder..
I think I could live with 45hp lol. My metro is rated 55hp at the crank but thank god its manual. I've driven the larger 1.3L but automatic and they are complete dogs.
__________________
|
|
|
06-24-2007, 11:33 AM
|
#3
|
Team GasMisers5!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 440
|
Probably different to the ones I used to see in the UK
You don't get them now because they have all rusted away!
__________________
 
Team GasMisers5 - #1 for first three rounds of the original GS Fuel Economy Challenge
Miles displaced by e-bike since 1 Jan 2008: 62.6 ( 0 kWh used)
Hypomiler
|
|
|
06-24-2007, 11:44 AM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 358
|
Yea, I think they were discontinued in the late 80's anyways. Ive never seen one in person..
__________________
|
|
|
02-26-2008, 09:19 AM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 87
|
Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I'd like to make a point I didn't see made in the preceding replies.
Given two cars identical accept for the weight, the heavier car will have a greater ratio of weight to aerodynamic drag. When coasting down hills, the propelling force is a proportion of the weight of the vehicle. Where aerodynamic drag is the predominate slowing force, a heavier car could maintain a faster speed down a given slope. Why is this important? Well, because if one car maintains 52 mph EOC'ing down a given slope of the freeway, and the heavier car maintains 60 mph down the same slope, if the driver wants to maintain the minimum 60 mph in order to avoid causing a traffic disruption, guess which car burns less fuel? You guessed it, the heavier car, because the light car will require the engine on and at light throttle to maintain minimum speed (inefficient area of the poweband), while the heavy car will have the engine off.
Just some food for thought.
__________________
|
|
|
02-26-2008, 06:38 PM
|
#6
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 758
|
> weight = > rolling resistance
|
|
|
02-26-2008, 07:01 PM
|
#7
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 303
|
I have tried to decide whether I do better with my wife along or without her. I am not sure. Why not take several friends with you and see if it helps.
It has been said that P&G is a poor man's hybrid. The heavier your car the bigger your pseudo battery.
I decided a long time ago that the extra battery in my trunk is not a penalty.
__________________
usedgeo
|
|
|
06-21-2007, 06:26 AM
|
#8
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 77
|
I believe weight reduction would only hinder you (based on your theory) if you are coasting more than you are accelerating or cruising, which I don't believe is the case with most of us. And unless you are taking out a great deal of weight, I don't believe it helps much at all. I drove my Civic with full interior for a tank and got about 47mpg. Then I gutted everything out but the driver's seat and dash for a tank. MPG ended up about the same. So I will probably be putting the seats back in this weekend. All that stuff equals up to 100 lbs or so. Didn't make much difference in my case, based on a couple fill-up's.
__________________
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
|