Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill in Houston
The politicians that you elected decided that you needed to be safer. The euro and asian pols don't feel the same way. Why?...
|
In the US we want the machine to do it. That goes for safety as well as fuel economy.
We buy a Prius and drive it 70-75 mph, get 45-48 mpg and are happy. We buy an auto tranny and are happy, even though a standard will gets better mpg.
For safety, we want big and solid, and/or lots of air bags. Forget about seat belts, we wish we could leave them off and rely on the air bags to save our a**es.
The Europeans on the other hand design cars for better handling and for better outward visibility (so you can see what's around you). Much better for accident avoidance. But that puts the safety responsibility on the driver.
Same for fuel economy. They make - and buy - mostly standard trannies and people learn how to use them, I would imagine.
The best thing we could do for fuel economy in this country would be to require a real-time mpg display in every car, small truck and SUV. Right in the middle of the instrument cluster, the digits to be the same size as the ones on the speedometer. Tell the people what they're doing. Let them see what happens to their wallet every time they out-testosterone some other driver. Start putting the US driver in control of fuel economy by giving him some information.
We also should be teaching fuel-economy principles in driver ed. If people would start out with some good basic information they would be better off than they are now. As it is you have to hunt for an education in fuel economy.
__________________
Currently getting +/- 50 mpg in fall weather. EPA is 31/39 so not too shabby. WAI, fuel cutoff switch, full belly pan, smooth wheel covers.
Now driving '97 Civic HX; tires ~ 50 psi. '89 Volvo 240 = semi-retired.