Quote:
Originally Posted by JockoT
If you have a car engine with an exceptionally high compression ratio and a fuelling system that can deliver sufficient fuel to the engine, then you can get performance out of the engine.
If however the car is using standard compression ratio and a fuel system designed for petrol and you try to run E85 then each litre of fuel will have a compromised amount of energy and performance will suffer.
Early racing engines used 10% acetone in water but you could not run a standard road car on that.
|
Yes, the case I was thinking of was the Sonic/Aveo 1.4L turbo. The engine was designed for the world's relatively higher octanes, and the software included the fuel tables for E85. In the US, GM just labeled it as regular octane, and let the knock sensors do their thing. It just needed the E85 fuel tables unlocked and an alcohol sensor to become flexfuel. Some opted to just have the fuel table switched to run just E85.
I've seen comments from other model owners running E85 that they got more power. It may not actually be so, but the higher octane of the ethanol would allow more advanced timing of the ignition. Even without a performance improvement from that, the engine was probably running smoother.
Then I understand modding cars are easier here than there.
There were multiple problems in the way the US went about E85. The engines the manufacturers chose to use was one of them. They went regular compression engines. An engine with a higher compression would have been able to take better advantage of the ethanol for performance and efficiency.