Quote:
Originally Posted by lca13
>>if you had read my post more carefully maybe you could have learned...
Jeesh, lighten up. And consider the possibility that the corollary is true.
|
what corollary? we are speaking pretty subjectively... either way there isnt a car that gets better mpg at 65 than 55 given all other variables are made constant. also if you are shifting at 2500 you are definitely not shifting at the lowest rpm. i dont think the corollary implied is able to be proven. although i have no intention of disproving it
i didnt mean to make it seem like i was getting heated, i just get annoyed when people disagree with me just because i am not telling them what they want to hear.
Wyldesoul 
Threaded Mode
