|
|
08-07-2007, 04:16 PM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 112
Country: United States
|
too expensive FE ideas?
Auto manufacturers do latch on to the FE ideas that are cheap. I'm wondering about the ones they don't use because they're too little return for the expense, and just where is that line?
And some ideas get ignored because styling and marketing are more important, or people don't want them. Aerodynamics seems to be the number one sacrifice in pursuit of convenience and looks. As in, no rear wheel skirts.
But the sorts of things I'm thinking about are things such as ceramic coatings, cryo treatments, lighter components made of magnesium alloys or carbon fiber, instant engine on/off capability, and better transmissions. Conventional automatic trannies are a crime. The manufacturer bears none of the fuel cost for those, and I'm guessing of all the ways to avoid having to shift gears, the conventional automatic is the cheapest from the manufacturer's view and the worst for FE.
So what all is out there that works except it's too expensive to be worth doing? Stuff that would take 500,000 miles or some such to pay back.
__________________
|
|
|
08-07-2007, 04:55 PM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 358
Country: United States
|
FE cars dont get along well with BigOil, and like you've mentioned, have a smaller profit margin with the manufacturer. Right there your screwed. And since most people would rather have a sporty looking car, or hp beast, I don't think there is much of a market for the extreme hypermiler.
And their is always the security factor too. Weight=safety (please dont knit-pick that one).
__________________
__________________
|
|
|
08-07-2007, 06:13 PM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,138
Country: United States
|
electric power steering
electric water pump
hybrids
all led lighting
??
__________________
|
|
|
08-07-2007, 06:23 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 358
Country: United States
|
Most people are lazy,dumb, and uncompromising. People like their big suv's with power,safetym , and plenty of room.
Compromise! is the only answer. If you want good mpg, you'll have to sacrifice something, and the general public probably wont until gas touches 5$.
__________________
|
|
|
08-07-2007, 06:26 PM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 933
Country: United States
|
--Solar panel roof to recharge the battery.
--carbon fiber body panels for weight reduction.
--Replacing mirrors with cameras + monitor.
Thats all I can think of. There are plenty of other things.
__________________
2008 EPA adjusted:
Distance traveled by bicycle in 2007= 1,830ish miles
Average commute speed=25mph (yes, that's in a car)
|
|
|
08-07-2007, 07:29 PM
|
#6
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 66
Country: United States
|
Flaming River, a company noted for street rod steering components, has a new electric assist power steering unit. Mighty spendy though--like thousands. Ignoring the cost, it does seem to have potential.
__________________
|
|
|
08-07-2007, 07:35 PM
|
#7
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
|
New cars.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
08-07-2007, 07:58 PM
|
#8
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 160
Country: United States
|
regen braking (either battery or compressed inert gases)
|
|
|
08-07-2007, 08:06 PM
|
#9
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 49
Country: United States
Location: FL
|
The 3 easiest things for manufacturers to do that they never will because they are scumbags:
-Less emphasis on power, speed and size in advertising and more emphasis on economy and environment
-More aerodynamic styling instead of the modern boxy agressive look
-Torque converter locks whenever the car isn't stopped or accelerating (Simple ECU mod)
Things that won't happen because of america's lazy and "I want it to be easier/faster for me" society:
-Less automatics, more manuals
-Slower cars, smaller engines
-Less heavy sh*t (POWER folding seats? POWER opening doors? Giagantic useless luxury SUV/Pickup? That crap just isn't necessary and never will be!)
-Aerodynamic, sleek styling (again), everyone loves the big agressive look! Why can't it be like the 30s and 40s when cars were more aerodynamic than some of the aircraft of the era?
-SLOWING DOWN, this one will never happen in our society
Mainly, the lack of effeciency in the world is a societal thing, if it were cool to be green and save money, believe me, all of our cars would get 50mpg off the lot and practically crap live baby trees and animals out the exhaust pipe!
|
|
|
08-07-2007, 09:06 PM
|
#10
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 98
Country: United States
|
Lots of weight reducing stuff. Aluminum bodies, thin glass, and so on. But the sky's the limit: composite everything held together with through-drilled titanium bolts.
There's lots of things that harshness is the issue, not money. No sound insulation, zero toe-in, straight-cut sliding-gear transmissions, etc. You can get way better aerodynamics for free if you didn't care about looks.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
|