|
|
06-02-2007, 05:34 AM
|
#11
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,138
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by omgwtfbyobbq
but I think it's suitability depends on how much escapes, at around 5% it's equivalent to gasoline in terms of GWP, but if it gets near 10% gasoline whips it's butt.
|
Losing even 5% would be pretty alarming, I think? Shouldn't the amount lost due to leaks be like maybe .1%? I'm thinking of air hoses and their fittings and assuming that Phill and the GX would be at least as good. If Phill lost even 1%, he'd be blowing up garages pretty regularly... From a consumer acceptance standpoint, Honda would need to make sure that people didn't smell gas in their garages. And from a liability standpoint, they would want to make sure that at the time of line uncoupling, the volume around the coupling that exceeded the LEL would need to be really small... Okay, I think I'm done.
__________________
__________________
|
|
|
06-02-2007, 06:47 AM
|
#12
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Country: United States
|
I find it interesting that CNG and LPG would be worst for GHG and GWP due to leakage in getting it. You would think that the small amount that is leaked would be offset by the amount of reduced GHG from being burned. It's never easy. Here's some more info on emissions.
__________________
|
|
|
06-02-2007, 09:44 AM
|
#13
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill in Houston
Losing even 5% would be pretty alarming, I think? Shouldn't the amount lost due to leaks be like maybe .1%? I'm thinking of air hoses and their fittings and assuming that Phill and the GX would be at least as good. If Phill lost even 1%, he'd be blowing up garages pretty regularly... From a consumer acceptance standpoint, Honda would need to make sure that people didn't smell gas in their garages. And from a liability standpoint, they would want to make sure that at the time of line uncoupling, the volume around the coupling that exceeded the LEL would need to be really small... Okay, I think I'm done.
|
It's not just at the car, although that's probably significant, but over the entire supply chain. It's only a problem because CNG traps roughly 60 times more heat than carbon dioxide, so any and all emissions result in a big spike in GHGs.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
06-02-2007, 04:30 PM
|
#14
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,138
Country: United States
|
Okay, thanks, then. Still, that seems so high...
__________________
|
|
|
06-02-2007, 04:39 PM
|
#15
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
|
The percentage of CNG lost, or the GWP methane?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
06-03-2007, 01:15 AM
|
#16
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 155
Country: United States
|
CNG sounds like a great solution. I would love to try CNG, but I've never seen a station that sells it in my life.
__________________
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33 PM.