03-24-2010, 04:26 AM
|
#1
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 0
|
The Hull Effect
Hello all,
I am a new member...I am Robert W Hull...inventor/co-inventor of The Hull Effect.
In July of 2009 a member scouted out my forum.
For all those people who are skeptics, the historical patent search performed has the US Patent office decalring this as a new field of study for the internal combustion engines.
By improving the thermodynamic heat exchange by several times, greatly reducing the "drag" of all fluids, improving the viscocities of all fluids, decreasing the aero-dynamic drag by creating and maintaining a "static electrical field"... via the manipulations of the frequencies created by the alternator.
For these reasons...only carbureted engines will allow for the many adjustments for re-tuning.
Recent dyno testing proved over 200 foot punds of torque out of a 134 cubic inch (2200 cc) at 1300 rpm's....using 6.67 to one compression ratio.
The oddity...when the engine stalled with dynometer hooked up...it re-started without removing the torque load of the friction brake dynometer...using just the 12V standard starter....and one 12V battery.
That is 130 foot pounds of torque at start-up...almost instantly...at 900 rpm ...a high idle.
More than enough torque to cruise at 60 mph in a 4000 pound vehicle.
additional 70 foot pounds of torque in the next 400 rpm's.
Ergo the higher the rpm's...the more torque...so no need for hypermilling.
Fuel consumption for moving a 12,500 pound machine...is less than 48 ounces per hour...no matter what the terrain...or altitutde.
My point...for all the wonderful mpg.. posted on this forum...great achievements...
The Hull Effect is the next phase of technology for the internal combustion engine.
Many skeptics can be secure in the fact....this is not snake oil or a scam.
The 2 best patent attornies in the world have stated so.
Why do I post???
The Hull Effect, being a new field of study has little to compare to...no existing authorities with PHD's.
As it stands, only three of us know the adjustments to make.
I can state that I have passed the 100 mpg marker in a full sized GMC pick-up truck....with many modifications....3 years ago....using a V-8...automatic transmission...lock out converter.
Best to all,
Robert W Hull
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|