02-10-2010, 05:17 AM
|
#10
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 618
|
I worry about cruise control with increased IAT. Why? Because there's no secret in the reduction of engine power/performance while a HAI is in place and up to temp... thus, using cruise will require more fuel to power the car at the same rate as not using the HAI. As I think CC is wastefull in itself (excess fuel/throttle used as viewed using a vacuum gauge hooked up to manifold vac while on interstate), how much more wastefull will the computer be (fuel control wise) to compensate for the IAT's 60-70*F above what its used to reading?
Yes, you have to add more foot pressure when not in cruise while running a HAI so you'd say it all evens out, but I'm just saying, hypermilers do it w/o cruise to achieve best results... I think cruise will skew the results a bit.
Honestly?
I'm trying to be a stickler. I have my reasons.
__________________
 John
'09 Saturn Aura 2.4L
'94 Chevy Camaro Z28 (5.7L 6sp)
'96 Chevy C1500 (5.0L 5sp)
'08 Kawasaki Vulcan 900 Custom
'01 KTM Duke 2
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|