Quote:
Originally Posted by brelandt
rh77....I just finished reading most of the 2 page thread on this subject. Of course I never noticed the thread to start with until I had already started this one.
However the old thread ended with no new/further results on the testing.
So you say you did do it then, correct?
|
No big deal about not noting the thread -- I try to recall what I've tried over the last year or so and that was one failed attempt. It turns out that the thread turned out to contain less info than I remembered.
What I used to restrict the air was to plug the intake with a stopper-like device that had a small-diameter hole in the center. To get up to speed, maintain speed, or drive with load, required a considerable amount of throttle input and resulted in more fuel consumption. I don't have anything scientific or an A-B-A test, but it did free up power and consequently less throttle input. Scanguage values were used and showed that no gain was attained, and sluggish engine operation resulted.
I welcome another test for maximum scientific attainability.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincoln
Instead of a restrictor plate you could create some sort of throttle stop that would never allow you to go over 25% throttle.
I would think a restrictor plate would allow you to add more gas, but would restrict the air flow causing a rich condition. If I am wrong someone please correct me.
|
I have implemented a 20% maximum-throttle-input cruise control apparatus that takes less attention while cruising on the highway. Whatever 20% throttle gives me, is what I'll take on the Interstate. Once up to speed, it may reach 70 downhill and slow to 55 uphill -- the result is the "Driving with Load" technique.
A spring-loaded throttle is a good idea -- one I've wanted to try.
RH77