Restricter plate - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 01-04-2007, 04:12 PM   #1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 84
Country: United States
Restricter plate

Anyone every intall a restricter plate too see if mileage improved?

I was thinking of doing it if there was proof it worked. If it does would it be better to install the plate under the TB or before it?
__________________

__________________
brelandt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 05:07 PM   #2
Registered Member
 
AlexK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 42
Country: United States
It seems to me that a restrictor plate would hurt mileage due to pumping losses. Am I missing something?
__________________

__________________
AlexK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 05:11 PM   #3
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
Tried it -- Failed for me

I tried restricting the intake on the Integra and it just took more throttle input and no appreciable gain:

Thread.

It could vary from vehicle to vehicle, but compared to old carbeurated vehicles of the past, the ECU will adjust accordingly. More importantly, intake temperture should be optimized.

RH77
__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 05:12 PM   #4
Supporting Member
 
Hockey4mnhs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 760
Country: United States
If there isnt proof you should test it and tell us the end results.
__________________
Hockey4mnhs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 05:53 PM   #5
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 84
Country: United States
rh77....I just finished reading most of the 2 page thread on this subject. Of course I never noticed the thread to start with until I had already started this one.

However the old thread ended with no new/further results on the testing.

So you say you did do it then, correct?
__________________
brelandt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 07:24 PM   #6
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 55
Country: United States
Instead of a restrictor plate you could create some sort of throttle stop that would never allow you to go over 25% throttle.

I would think a restrictor plate would allow you to add more gas, but would restrict the air flow causing a rich condition. If I am wrong someone please correct me.
GasSavers_Lincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 08:16 PM   #7
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 84
Country: United States
A throttle stop would be the cheapest and easiest to apply.....however designing a bypass system for emergency/needed situation would require some further thought on my part.

Maybe placing a heavy spring on the floor that would normally keep you from pushing it down any further but will allow the pedal to go all the way to the floor when you press down harder????
__________________
brelandt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 08:58 PM   #8
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
Mostly Guidance

Quote:
Originally Posted by brelandt
rh77....I just finished reading most of the 2 page thread on this subject. Of course I never noticed the thread to start with until I had already started this one.

However the old thread ended with no new/further results on the testing.

So you say you did do it then, correct?
No big deal about not noting the thread -- I try to recall what I've tried over the last year or so and that was one failed attempt. It turns out that the thread turned out to contain less info than I remembered.

What I used to restrict the air was to plug the intake with a stopper-like device that had a small-diameter hole in the center. To get up to speed, maintain speed, or drive with load, required a considerable amount of throttle input and resulted in more fuel consumption. I don't have anything scientific or an A-B-A test, but it did free up power and consequently less throttle input. Scanguage values were used and showed that no gain was attained, and sluggish engine operation resulted.

I welcome another test for maximum scientific attainability.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincoln
Instead of a restrictor plate you could create some sort of throttle stop that would never allow you to go over 25% throttle.

I would think a restrictor plate would allow you to add more gas, but would restrict the air flow causing a rich condition. If I am wrong someone please correct me.
I have implemented a 20% maximum-throttle-input cruise control apparatus that takes less attention while cruising on the highway. Whatever 20% throttle gives me, is what I'll take on the Interstate. Once up to speed, it may reach 70 downhill and slow to 55 uphill -- the result is the "Driving with Load" technique.

A spring-loaded throttle is a good idea -- one I've wanted to try.

RH77
__________________
rh77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2007, 09:46 PM   #9
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 409
Country: United States
I have a restrictor of sorts on my car, it's in the form of an alluminum can in the exhaust (flattened with a hole in it) It's whisper silent, but really cuts down the power. I wild estimate is %50 percent less power. It has actually helped my gas mileage around town. I used to always floor it and come sliding around the corners (bad habit) With this in there, my exhuast no longer encourages me to rev it up to enjoy the sound. If it was a manual, DON"T DO IT, you can't proper pulse and glide with it. On the highway ( low load) it seems to get nearly the same gas mileage (judged by odometer/fuel gauge only)
__________________
red91sit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 11:31 AM   #10
Registered Member
 
AlexK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 42
Country: United States
Quote:
Instead of a restrictor plate you could create some sort of throttle stop that would never allow you to go over 25% throttle.
For most gas engines, lots of throttle at low RPMs is the most efficient. This is because of the pumping loss across the throttle restriction. Why would you want to limit your throttle stroke to 25%? I use 90% throttle all the time and my MPG has improved since I started doing it.
__________________

__________________
AlexK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Show Running Average in Forum Signature lhwj Fuelly Web Support and Community News 1 08-20-2011 01:24 AM
TIME field missing in Add a fuel-up machapelle Fuelly Web Support and Community News 5 08-19-2011 09:54 AM
how's your MPG compared to others with the same car? MetroMPG General Fuel Topics 21 02-20-2009 03:37 PM
Seriously Considering an Import (Literally) rh77 General Discussion (Off-Topic) 5 03-24-2006 10:18 PM

» Fuelly Android Apps
No Threads to Display.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.