View Poll Results: Adopt the New EPA Estimates?
|
Yes
|
|
25 |
69.44% |
No
|
|
6 |
16.67% |
I dunno, ummm...
|
|
5 |
13.89% |
|
|
03-03-2007, 09:36 PM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
|
Poll: Adopt the EPA's "New" FE Figures?
OK, it looks like the EPA has changed their FE estimates for many vehicles.
Thread 1
Thread 2
For me, a considerable increase in the "Percentage FE over EPA Combined" would be realized.
Before I go updating this info in the garage, should I consider this inaccurate or accept it as the new value? For consistency, what are others doing?
Cast your vote...
RH77
__________________
__________________
|
|
|
03-03-2007, 09:42 PM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 933
Country: United States
|
No, it will be to much confusion on this site. Some people will end up putting in new epa and some will end up putting old epa figures. I vote for keeping with the old figures.
__________________
__________________
2008 EPA adjusted:
Distance traveled by bicycle in 2007= 1,830ish miles
Average commute speed=25mph (yes, that's in a car)
|
|
|
03-03-2007, 10:02 PM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 358
Country: United States
|
What do we do when they phase out the old figures, and at what point will new cars only be tested with the new method? I don't think that a sudden shift is going to be good now or later. For now, it might be good to have two fields: one for the new and one for the old. With the new figures, a higher percentage should be required for hypermiler status.
|
|
|
03-03-2007, 10:10 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
|
A epa-like comparison is ok, it levels the playing field and potentially encourages everyone, but maybe the comparison should be based on that users previous performance, like bracket racing or a golf handicap, so that it accurately absorbs the effects of the particular vehicle and environment?
EPA is pretty arbitrary starting point for comparisons between different vehicle types, especially considering it is currently in flux.
|
|
|
03-03-2007, 10:45 PM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 513
Country: United States
|
I say yes as there is no way to "backwards" test the new 08 vehicles to find their equivalent EPA value. Take two identical Prius for example an 03 and an 08, should the 03 get seemly better EPA figures compared to the 08?
__________________
|
|
|
03-03-2007, 11:55 PM
|
#6
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 760
Country: United States
|
where do i find the new ones for my car?
__________________
|
|
|
03-04-2007, 12:02 AM
|
#7
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,779
Country: United States
|
Hello -
I voted no but will wait abide by the outcome. We mostly just need to agree on which way to go. Resolving this now will make things easier down the line.
I do think that repete86 is right. There is going to be alot of confusion for people arriving with new or old cars, *UNLESS* the garage entry is *very* helpful in terms of identifying the EPA figures. For old or new cars, they need to be directed to the EPA MPG "remapper" URL. At least the nice thing about that URL is that it appears to be pretty comprehensive. We may need an evergreen "What's Your EPA MPG" thread to help newbies (a pointer in the FAQ or ?????). This thread could also be usefull for outside-USA people who want to fit their non-USA cars into the EPA MPG metrics.
Matt? Skewbe? What do you think?
(Thanks for the poll RH77!)
CarloSW2
|
|
|
03-04-2007, 12:46 AM
|
#9
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
Yes, new values. Better comparison between old and new cars...the reason you don't see values pre-85 is because they changed the testing and the old values became invalid. People don't look at them at all anymore. Rather than let the new old values fall by the wayside in terms of utility, we should switch to the corrected old values.
|
|
|
03-04-2007, 01:40 AM
|
#10
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 467
Country: United States
|
I also voted yes for the new values. New cars will have a different EPA test than before and these values do reflect today's driving environments (for example: the Trans-Canada Highway's speed limit in Saskatchewan was increased from 100km/h to 110km/h a few years back, and the amount of road congestion [hours spent being delayed in traffic] is increasing).
Time to be progressive and bite the bullet that will no doubt come.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:44 PM.