Mathematicians, Help me Formulate my tire PSI! - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 12-27-2009, 07:11 AM   #11
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
I think it was on the Tire Rack website - they didn't say how much it increased but they did say it did increase along with wall stiffness and increased weight. It didn't make a lot of sense to me since bicycle tires that were larger usually rolled much easier but that could also be from bearing drag differences at lower RPM for larger wheels.
__________________

JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 06:16 PM   #12
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 557
Country: United States
Higher tire pressures reduce the length of the contact patch chord, the flat section of the tire on the ground. This changes the rolling "circumference" distance (and rolling resistance) without changing the tire "diameter".
A loaded tire is shaped like a "D" on its side. The straight distance is less than the curved distance. At an absurd extreme, with a flat tire, no wheel rim, sitting on the axle centerline, the distance around the outside periphery would be (1/2 Pi * D)+ D. The resulting 2.57*D is less than the perfectly round unladen tire's 3.14*D.
More air pressure will increase the distances traveled for one tire revolution without necessarily increasing the tire size, just by reducing the size/length of the flat spot.
By enough to make a difference in miles recorded? Not likely.
Odometers and speedometers are not calibrated and certified to some degree of accuracy for most of us. Use a GPS to compare one set of data to another and use that empirical information to adjust your accuracy to the degree that you want.
The tire 'size' is probably no more accurate. My 100 "miles" before be different than my 100 "miles" after because of nothing more than my new 195/60-15 tires are a different brand than my old 195/60-15 tires. Never mind the circumference change from tread wear...
__________________

Lug_Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2009, 05:49 AM   #13
Site Team
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 659
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanGeo View Post
I think it was on the Tire Rack website
I looked around the website but couldn't find anything. If you happen to find a link, could you post it? It sure seems counter-intuitive.

-Bob C.
__________________
Think you are saving gas? Prove it by starting a Gas Log, then conduct a proper experiment.
bobc455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2009, 07:37 AM   #14
Registered Member
 
JanGeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
Send a message via Yahoo to JanGeo
4th paragraph down on this article:
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete...jsp?techid=175

Larger tires require more rubber and longer reinforcing cords than smaller tires. Therefore within a single tire model line, there is typically a relationship between tire size, weight and the resulting rolling resistance force where larger tires have more rolling resistance than smaller tires.

They really go over a lot of info in the tech section of Tire Rack - makes for very good reading.

LugNut . . . even with the D shapped tire the CIRCUMFERENCE doesn't change (steel belts do not shrink or stretch) and it still makes ONE revolution and that means the same distance traveled - the side walls take a beating with an under inflated tire and that's all.
JanGeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2010, 06:25 PM   #15
Registered Member
 
kamesama980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 742
Country: United States
Location: Columbus, IN, USA
Send a message via AIM to kamesama980 Send a message via Yahoo to kamesama980
the info on higher RR for smaller tires makes sense in a way. Though the difference in circumference usually makes up for it by far so you don't notice.

If you're worried about trip odometer accuracy, get a GPS and drive 100 miles and compare to your trip odometer. I've seen speedometers off by over 5% and odometers by slightly less from the factory
__________________

__________________
-Russell
1991 Toyota Pickup 22R-E 2.4 I4/5 speed
1990 Toyota Cressida 7M-GE 3.0 I6/5-speed manual
mechanic, carpenter, stagehand, rigger, and know-it-all smartass
"You don't get to judge me for how I fix what you break"
kamesama980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'95 Honda Civic DX hatchback w/ VX tranny pinging cems70 General Maintenance and Repair 8 02-09-2011 03:31 AM
Anyone bought the gold VX in NH yesterday? XyKo General Fuel Topics 1 07-06-2008 04:39 PM
More Consumers, Workers Shoplift as Economy Slows HondaTorneoSiR Automotive News, Articles and Products 2 06-19-2008 04:20 PM
Beating the Baro... MAP reading trickery? GasSavers_RoadWarrior General Fuel Topics 4 03-06-2008 02:43 AM
Performance Underdrive Pulleys? cfg83 General Maintenance and Repair 10 09-08-2007 09:04 PM

» Fuelly Android Apps
No Threads to Display.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.