Quote:
Originally Posted by ketel0ne
That which is measured, improves.
It works in exercise, tasking, process, time management and almost every other area of life and it works with MPG/FE too.
|
That's an excellent point, and a true one. The next question becomes "Am I measuring the right thing? Is there a discrepancy between my metric and the overall goal?"
For example, if you run 5000m and choose (for some stupid reason) to get better at it by sprinting, your sprint time will improve. When it comes time for race day and you run a worse 5000m than before because you gained muscle to help with the sprints, you might cry out "Why? But I was lowering my time/distance figure! I don't understand why I can be faster and yet slower!"
Another example might be sales. Say that you decide that you are making $200/day, and you do that by seeing 10 clients. You figure that if you can slot 15 clients into a single day, you can make $300/day. Instead of working more hours, you decide to rush through your presentation. The end result is that you cram more people in, but none of them want to buy from you because they feel like you are pushy, and you haven't answered their questions because they can't get a word in edgeways.
Instantaneous FE metering is a bit different in that respect, but there are still artifacts associated with improving your FE at any given point in time when your goal is to lower fuel consumption over the distances you need to travel. On balance though, there is no faster learning that will take place as with instantaneous feedback.
__________________