Is anyone impressed by these 'smart' cars? - Page 4 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
View Poll Results: Are you impressed that a golf cart can get 40mpg?
Yes 14 15.38%
No 77 84.62%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 01-26-2008, 10:32 AM   #31
Registered Member
 
VetteOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,546
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey4mnhs View Post
if it can change the mind set of America then will be impressed. I think if it can get people out of there suvs and big trucks then it did its job.
yea thats about all it can do (which im not complaining one bit)
__________________

VetteOwner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 07:41 AM   #32
Senior Member
 
101mpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 736
Country: United States
I don't understand all the hype about the Aveo - it tops out at about 34 highway, right?

I get about 38-39 MPG highway in my wife's 2004 Malibu Maxx. With my WIFE (she drives for poor FE, nearly all city, etc.) driving, the Maxx gets 1 MPG less than the lifetime MPG that Aveo. 38 MPG across Nebraska at about 85 MPH, btw. Malibumaxxed.com has one owner with a loveseat in the Maxx. It's freaking HUGE inside. 6" longer wheelbase than the Malibu and it's 1/2" SHORTER.

Full leather package (we did NOT get a DVD player or a sunroof), split leather actually (leather with suede centers - better with a family), every luxury convenience known to man, independent sliding rear 60/40 seats (they travel 2 feet!), rear independent headphone jacks, heated seats so I can turn on the A/C and my wife can turn on the you name it, this is one of the ultimate road trip cars with a family!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotareneg View Post
However, my Aveo5 SVM can carry both a passenger and groceries, and laundry, AND still have room left over.
__________________

__________________
Looking to trade for an early 1988 Honda CRX HF (Pillar mounted seat belts)
101mpg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 08:35 AM   #33
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 228
Country: United States
Honestly?

I think the sides and top are beautiful, almost a Lamborghini type of design, whoever thought of this is a genius, at least in terms of aerodynamics but also aesthetically it is a nice design.

Beautiful, splendid job so far, but then something awful must've happened, LOL...

I don't get the front and the back, that's just buckfutugleee...
It's like this genius ran out of steam before the car was finished...?

It's actually a simple matter of smoothing out that chopped off front and maybe bring the black portion in back down a little further. It wouldn't take much to straighten it out but as usual I'm not holding my breath, and I'm sorry but unless you promise 100+mpg you will never catch me buying an ugly car.
__________________
A FE gauge should be standard equipment in every vehicle.
8307c4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 04:17 AM   #34
Moderator
 
GasSavers_DaX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,209
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarbyWalters View Post
Bring the Diesel and then we will talk...
Ditto. I met a guy at a car show with a diesel one and his 6 month average was 74 MPG.
GasSavers_DaX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 11:06 AM   #35
Registered Member
 
bzipitidoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 112
Country: United States
Disappointing. The Smart does about 1 thing to get fuel economy: stay small. Chopping out the back seat is merely an extreme way to be small. All the rest of the ways to save gas they didn't really do. Tall gearing? Aerodynamics? Engine tech? The US version is not even especially light.

I wonder how well one of those 1L stick shift mid '90s Metros would do if someone did a chop job on it and removed the back seat, thus shortening the body?
bzipitidoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 01:14 PM   #36
Registered Member
 
jadziasman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 324
Country: United States
Want a Smart - order then wait a year!!!!

Just read today that each Smart car is made by order only. And - get this- it takes ONE YEAR for them to deliver it!!!! That's not too smart. My source was today's Automotive News, which is a trade magazine for car dealers.
jadziasman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 01:21 PM   #37
Registered Member
 
jandree22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 53
Country: United States
Location: Pennsylvania
Fad. Nothing more, nothing less.
__________________
jandree22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 01:46 PM   #38
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 97
Country: United States
I saw that it would cost from 12,500 to 17,500 depending on options. $17,500 is way too much for a tiny car, and a FIT would be better.

38 to 39 mpg hwy for a Malibu Maxx is impressive!
JESSE69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 03:24 PM   #39
Supporting Member
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,779
Country: United States
skewbe -

Quote:
Originally Posted by skewbe View Post
Yah, an experienced hypermiler (Wayne Gerdes) only got about 60mpg, mainly because the transmission would not let the car coast.

http://www.cleanmpg.com/forums/revie...rtwo-7133.html

Put a stick shift in it and I'm sure it would do a lot better in the right hands.
Yeah, lack of a stick-shift is my main complaint against it. I wish that the Smart ForFour was still an option because I think that would have been more practical for the US market :

Attachment 1174

You get the "conventional look" of a VW Golf-like car coupled with the exo-skeletal safety cell.

The cleanmpg article was interesting because I got to read about the in-development "mild hybrid" option :

Quote:
2008 SMART Fortwo ? Near Future
MHD (Micro-hybrid drive) is being seriously considered. MHD allows an approximate 10% drop in CO2 emissions on the European FE test results. Currently, there is the MHD?s basic 12V Start-Stop system upgrade costing only 250 Euros. It is run off a larger 12V w/ Voltage being monitored for SoC. If there is too low a voltage, the SMART MHD will not allow a Stop-Start cycle. Expect the MHD to make it over to the US with a $500 premium or thereabouts.
This is a gizmo which I wish we all had as an option for our cars.

Also, since it can be flat-towed, it may become a Winnebago scout-car.

CarloSW2
Attached Images
 
__________________
Old School SW2 EPA ... New School Civic EPA :

What's your EPA MPG? https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calculatorSelectYear.jsp
cfg83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 05:10 PM   #40
Senior Member
 
101mpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 736
Country: United States
We paid $11,888 for the Maxx with about 10,000 miles on it in 2007, so 3 year old vehicle. We pitted it up against every SUV on the market. I said it has to have equivalent or better mileage (ever one failed) and cost less (again, nothing new or used came within our price range). Better FE than any SUV, hauls almost as much as any minivan or smaller SUV out there, more than some like the RAV 4, etc., plus the LT is the luxury model!

It's the ultimate soccer mom car - good FE if you drive it easy and holds a TON. I don't feel bad when it's only a one-person vehicle, as it gets great mileage. The biggest drawbacks: if the stereo breaks, the car won't start, also - electric power steering. The 2007 has mechanical again - sacrifice of 1/2 mile per gallon - that's it.

It is also more comfortable than most Cadillacs. However - do NOT get the LS - very noisy, not nearly as comfortable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JESSE69 View Post
I saw that it would cost from 12,500 to 17,500 depending on options. $17,500 is way too much for a tiny car, and a FIT would be better.

38 to 39 mpg hwy for a Malibu Maxx is impressive!
__________________

__________________
Looking to trade for an early 1988 Honda CRX HF (Pillar mounted seat belts)
101mpg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuelly Android App - eehokie Fuelly Web Support and Community News 2 07-14-2010 09:59 PM
Combined totals of all my vehicles? nizationpcs Fuelly Web Support and Community News 0 03-30-2009 07:41 AM
Sliding shelve unit Telco General Discussion (Off-Topic) 4 07-18-2007 05:23 PM
Mph Caps billynjoanna General Fuel Topics 2 06-10-2007 12:38 PM
Conversions zpiloto Fuelly Web Support and Community News 3 11-01-2006 11:42 PM

» Fuelly Android Apps
No Threads to Display.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.