Quote:
Originally Posted by JockoT
I thought that modern cars have a knock detector that checks for the onset of knocking and adjusts the timing accordingly? I may be mistaken, but that is my belief regarding my Honda Jazz. And if the fuel allows a more advanced ignition setting that is supposed to give better performance.
Feel free to slap me down if I am wrong.
|
Knock sensors aren't miracle workers. The system runs the most advanced ignition timing it can, but it can only advance so far. Without a higher compression ratio, using a higher than recommended octane isn't going to provide any performance or efficiency benefit. The cases in which that do exist usually involve cars in which the manufacture recommends a lower octane for sales purposes, but the engine was actually designed for higher.
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeatlast
Higher octane does not give better MPG. Do a google search on the subject. Higher octane does not have any more BTU's than lower octane. Octane is an anti knock additive not a BTU additive.
As for 85 octane that is below what the manufacture recommends for these vehicles. 87 is the lowest that should ever be used or you could suffer head gasket problems from poor detonation.
Pure gas will always give better MPG than an Ethanol blend You can get 10 to 15 percent better MPG with pure gas. There is absolutely no need to mix different octane ratings.
|
A larger compression ratio can provide better performance and efficiency. So higher octane can improve fuel economy in an engine over lower, if that CR is high enough to take advantage of it.
Octane lower than 87 is available in areas of high elevation, because of the thinner air. Using it in a naturally aspirated engine in those locations isn't an issue. The engineers would have designed a safety buffer into the system if a car with 85 in its tank goes down to a lower elevation, or if the gas happens to age.