|
12-16-2007, 02:53 PM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 11
Country: United States
|
Human MPG biking and walking
I thought it would be interesting to calculate the 'mpg' of walking and biking...so here goes.
A gallon of gas contains about 31,000 Kilocalories (Kc).
An average person expends 100 Kc to walk one mile.
An average person bicycling leisurely (9 mph) expends about 23 Kc per mile.
So, if he/she could get all the needed calories from a gallon of gas (ugh), he/she
would get:
310 mpg walking (31000/100), and
1348 mpg bicycling (31000/23).
Since you can't get your calories from gas, what would be the cost in
Snicker's Bar Equivalents (my measure) for a 'gallon' of gas?
A Snicker's bar has 280 Kc and costs about 60 cents. So:
31000/280*.60= $66.42 per 'gallon'.
__________________
|
|
|
12-16-2007, 03:06 PM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
|
I'll take $66.42 per gallon at 1348 mpg
__________________
|
|
|
12-16-2007, 03:19 PM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 290
Country: United States
|
VNelson: Nice first post. It should be good to have some new insight on things around here. Your breakdown was easy to understand, and at least in my opinion, warrants some serious thought. You could of course complicate things by factoring in the fact that Snickers aren't free energy, and that they consume energy during their raw materials collection, production, and transportation.
Otherwise, it was an interesting read. Perhaps you could look at a less energy intensive item, like home-grown fruits?
|
|
|
12-16-2007, 04:29 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 298
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erdrick
Otherwise, it was an interesting read. Perhaps you could look at a less energy intensive item, like home-grown fruits?
|
Then again, fruit is, by nature,fairly low in calories. Yes, it is less energy intensive than a candy bar. But you have to eat MUCH more of it to get a given numer of calories.
|
|
|
12-16-2007, 04:34 PM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
|
Xootr used to calculate things like this to stress how cost effective their rather expensive electric scooter the eX3 was compared to the energy of food needed to trave a simular distance.
|
|
|
12-16-2007, 09:54 PM
|
#6
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 290
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StorminMatt
Then again, fruit is, by nature,fairly low in calories. Yes, it is less energy intensive than a candy bar. But you have to eat MUCH more of it to get a given numer of calories.
|
I wouldn't make such a blanket statement as that if I were you. A quick googling of the topic at hand yields these results...
http://www.dietbites.com/CalorieIndexFruit.html
If you are talking vegetables though, then yes, they are for the most part pretty low in calories. Fruits are usually loaded with sugars and other carbohydrates though, so they can hold quite a few calories. Vegetables mainly just have vitamins and minerals though. Avocado can be pretty fatty, but your average green pepper, tomato, and carrot are relatively low in calories.
|
|
|
12-17-2007, 08:36 AM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 278
Country: United States
Location: CT
|
Huh... If you look at the cost, riding your bike is only about equivalent to 60mpg or so, and walking only gets you 15 or so mpg. Estimating with gas around $3 a gallon.
$66 devided by $3 gives me 22.
1350/22 = 61.36mpg
310/22 = 14.09mpg
Now, other foods. Dried apricots seem to be the most calorie dense of all, so estimating a cup of dried apricots at around $1.00...
31000/381*1 = $81 per "gallon"
$81/$3 gives me a factor of 27
1350/27 = 50
310/27 = 11.48
So, with apricots, biking only gets you 50 mpg, and walking only gets a paltry 11.5 mpg? Holy cow....
|
|
|
12-17-2007, 09:37 AM
|
#8
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
|
you should try alternative fuels instead of snickers bars
a 5lb bag of riceland rice is listed at $3.99
thats .25 cup serving=50 servings per container @160 calories per serving
so it would take 3.875 bags for one gal equivelent, or $15.46 a gallon for rice. I imagine dried beans would be an excellent value as well.
(FYI, at $15.46, that is about 240 mpg equivelant on a bike)
|
|
|
12-17-2007, 12:44 PM
|
#9
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 682
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skewbe
you should try alternative fuels instead of snickers bars
a 5lb bag of riceland rice is listed at $3.99
thats .25 cup serving=50 servings per container @160 calories per serving
so it would take 3.875 bags for one gal equivelent, or $15.46 a gallon for rice. I imagine dried beans would be an excellent value as well.
(FYI, at $15.46, that is about 240 mpg equivelant on a bike)
|
How about a direct comparison? Ethanol can power people, bicycles and cars. What is the mpg rating of ethanol - powered humans?
BTW, my engine's shot. Can anybody please find me a replacement liver?
__________________
Capitalism: The cream rises. Socialism: The scum rises.
|
|
|
12-17-2007, 01:09 PM
|
#10
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 11
Country: United States
|
Searching for calorie dense foods, it seems that soybean oil (generic) will get
your mpg back up there. A bottle sells for $2.50, 1 T is 120 calories and there are 96 servings per bottle for a total of 11,520 calories. That works
out to:
31000/11520*$2.50= $6.73 per 'gallon' and a factor of $6.73/3 or 2.24
So roughly-
1350/2.2 = 614 bike mpg
310/2.2 = 141 walking mpg
All in all, though, not sure you could actually eat the stuff in those quantities.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
|