03-29-2009, 07:40 AM
|
#33
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 198
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobski
Desktop computers made the same transitions that processors in automotive applications have... 8 to 16 to 32 to 64 bit. Are you suggesting that, within one of those groups, the processors introduced at the beginning of development would be just as powerful as those released later on? Developments in architecture and/or maximum clock speeds can make big differences in processing power, without messing with the bus size.
It wouldn't surprise me if both ECUs had 8-bit processors... A more powerful processor probably would have been excessively expensive and just plain overkill. I doubt even the ECUs sold in new cars use anything beyond a 16 bit processor.
|
The 88-95 systems are referenced in there fuel and ignition systems in the same section. They do mention the only thing that has change was some evolutionary changes and ecu is now called a pcm. whatever that means. I'll have to find all the relevant data and post it. I'm not really saying anything. I can't read a manufactures mind. I'm just stating some facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow
For those not familiar with it, ARRC is free of charge for use at many public libraries or by library members for use at home. Check your library's website, look for something about online databases or online reference, and look for either ARRC or EBSCO (EBSCO is the company that provides ARRC).
|
If you didn't know, your *** better call somebody. It's AWESOME!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|