|
|
08-31-2006, 10:18 AM
|
#11
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
Oh, it bolts right up. And don't worry, I'm here to help!
__________________
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 10:30 AM
|
#12
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 171
Country: United States
|
Nice writeup on the ride-height lowering - using the lowering springs. However, didn't I recently read somewhere that if you use the stock shock/strut tubes for lowering the car --that they don't last very long at all?
__________________
__________________
GAS GSLR
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 10:35 AM
|
#13
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
It's true depending on how much you lower, I'm running tokico illuminas now though,
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 11:03 AM
|
#14
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 171
Country: United States
|
I see. So anyway, what size tires/wheels are those VX's? According to this website: http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html if I change my current setup of 175/70/13's to 185/75/14's, my speedo will be underexagerrated by 6MPH, therefore increasing (to my knowledge) my effective MPG. Of course I'll have a slightly larger contact patch with the 185's. But probably not enough to make a difference. As long as I can find a lightweight setup I'll go for it. As it stands right now I only run with +2 PSI above MFG recommendations. Let me know how your car rides with stiffer suspension COMBINED WITH high-inflated tires. Thx.
__________________
GAS GSLR
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 11:06 AM
|
#15
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
Car runs perfectly, nice and tight. Anyway, I think the VXs are 175/70/13, but not exactly sure. The HXs are the 14s, both are good, with the HXs you can run the insight LRRs though, so yay.
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 11:10 AM
|
#16
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,480
Country: United States
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
|
And with the insight tires at 165/65/14, you have the same diameter as the 175/70/13's. No underexaggeration!.
__________________
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 11:12 AM
|
#17
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
dan.
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 11:14 AM
|
#18
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,480
Country: United States
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVOboy
dan.
|
You are gonna sprain you thumb Ben.
__________________
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 11:22 AM
|
#19
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
It's not my fault, you're just TOO COOL!
|
|
|
08-31-2006, 11:28 AM
|
#20
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 171
Country: United States
|
sorry, I meant to express my definite WANT for the underexagerration. As long as I can run a larger diameter setup I'll be running a higher MPH at a lower RPM (even though my speedo won't show it). I DO want this. Call it a cheap way to change my effective gearing since I've got the larger circumferance, taking longer to complete a single revolution in a given gear. I want this. I'm sure I'm not the only one who does.
__________________
__________________
GAS GSLR
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:22 PM.