|
04-26-2008, 10:26 PM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20
Country: United States
|
Headers help gas mileage?
Has anyone installed a header to replace the stock exhaust/cat. convert. to help MPG? and gotten good results?
Afraid to mess with it. o2 sensor problems, etc...
Honda civic hatchback 1.5 liter engines
TravelThisWorld.com
__________________
|
|
|
04-27-2008, 12:33 AM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 49
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperVX
Has anyone installed a header to replace the stock exhaust/cat. convert. to help MPG? and gotten good results?
Afraid to mess with it. o2 sensor problems, etc...
Honda civic hatchback 1.5 liter engines
|
I swapped in a header and was not convinced because the o2 sensor readone port.
however I swapped in a actory SI 1.6 header/exhaust manifold and added a flexible exaust piece and was able to keep the car in in lean burn alot longer
i like the little extra power let me know if you are in socal i have 2 of the for sale
__________________
__________________
VX MASTER
SHWINN MOUNTAIN BIKE
GAS SAVER FAT BURNER
TOTAL MILES DISPLACED BY SHWIIN ON THE WAY TO WORK. 45 TOTAL MILES
|
|
|
04-27-2008, 07:01 AM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,325
Country: United States
|
I have not yet seen a header for a 1.5 liter Honda engine, all of the headers I've seen are to big to work well, at least according to the books on designing exhaust systems I've read, about 1.25" inside diamator would be about as large of an exhaust header tube diamtor that I would be willing to put on my car, and 2" seems to be what is out there.
|
|
|
04-27-2008, 08:22 AM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 336
Country: United States
|
I got a header on my dx motor, the mpg that i had before and after it was the same, but i do notice a bit more top end power and its a whole lot lighter than the cast iron OEM header
i really did it for the looks and weight savings taken off of the front end of the car
|
|
|
04-27-2008, 12:53 PM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,264
Country: United States
Location: up nawth
|
In most cases performance mods are the opposite of what you want to do for efficiency.
In 1950 the Alfa grand prix motor got 390 HP out of 1500 cc at 2 miles per gallon.
My Vx is stock except for the reversed intake snorkel that draws hot air from the top radiator area. When I say stock it still has the original tires put on in 9-93, and just under 30k miles.
The cast iron manifold retains heat for hot air intake, which may offset any weight gain advantage.
My last three tanks were 62,55 (local), and 65.74 MPG.
Today when I merged on the uphill acceleration ramp to the interstate I hit 4500 RPM, I dont think it has been past 3 k in the last 1000 miles.
regards
gary
__________________
|
|
|
04-27-2008, 01:42 PM
|
#6
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20
Country: United States
|
Thanks For The Replies Everybody!
|
|
|
04-27-2008, 01:44 PM
|
#7
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,652
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland
I have not yet seen a header for a 1.5 liter Honda engine, all of the headers I've seen are to big to work well, at least according to the books on designing exhaust systems I've read, about 1.5" inside diamator would be about as large of an exhaust header tube diamtor that I would be willing to put on my car, and 2" seems to be what is out there.
|
Agreed...
I keep looking at electrical conduit, the steel pipe stuff, and wondering how long a header globbed together out of that would last... mostly as welding and fabbing practice and to test dimensions/results before spending out on the stainless steel bits to do it "properly".
__________________
I remember The RoadWarrior..To understand who he was, you have to go back to another time..the world was powered by the black fuel & the desert sprouted great cities..Gone now, swept away..two mighty warrior tribes went to war & touched off a blaze which engulfed them all. Without fuel, they were nothing..thundering machines sputtered & stopped..Only those mobile enough to scavenge, brutal enough to pillage would survive. The gangs took over the highways, ready to wage war for a tank of juice
|
|
|
04-27-2008, 05:16 PM
|
#8
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 742
Country: United States
Location: Columbus, IN, USA
|
the zinc anodizing will burn off (which is highly toxic) and then it'll rust quick. for prototyping purposes it'll probly be fine as long as you are in a highly ventilated area for cutting, welding, and running the car.
as for them helping gas mileage, most NA mods to a car (minor ones... not cams and crazy rpms) do help gas mileage to a point. it mostly depends on what the stock parts are like as to if there's a gain and how much. for headers: it's a LOT more helpfull to redo the rest of the exhaust system to match them. IE nice headers with the stock cat and cat-back won't do much. in cressidas/supras headers and full exhaust at 2.25" with quality mufflers will gain about 10-15% hp and improve 2-3 mpg all around because it's designed from the factory for in-town driving with a large car and luxury quiet. (supras have the exact same exhaust except for having a 1-in, 2-out muffler)
__________________
-Russell
1991 Toyota Pickup 22R-E 2.4 I4/5 speed
1990 Toyota Cressida 7M-GE 3.0 I6/5-speed manual
mechanic, carpenter, stagehand, rigger, and know-it-all smartass
"You don't get to judge me for how I fix what you break"
|
|
|
04-28-2008, 10:02 PM
|
#9
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 10
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.I.D.E.
In most cases performance mods are the opposite of what you want to do for efficiency.
In 1950 the Alfa grand prix motor got 390 HP out of 1500 cc at 2 miles per gallon.
My Vx is stock except for the reversed intake snorkel that draws hot air from the top radiator area. When I say stock it still has the original tires put on in 9-93, and just under 30k miles.
The cast iron manifold retains heat for hot air intake, which may offset any weight gain advantage.
My last three tanks were 62,55 (local), and 65.74 MPG.
Today when I merged on the uphill acceleration ramp to the interstate I hit 4500 RPM, I dont think it has been past 3 k in the last 1000 miles.
regards
gary
|
Agree.
Besides, you want to keep back pressure for that precious low end TQ.
Alex
__________________
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
|