|
View Poll Results: In the FE Team Challenge, how should the 3-gallon mimimum rule be handled?
|
|
Take the Average of 4 team members -- the Team Captain chooses whose data to drop for the month
|
   
|
4 |
30.77% |
|
3 Members' data are included: Automatically, using Max/Min number of gallons used
|
  
|
2 |
15.38% |
|
Leave the Rule, Penalize the Driver (NOTE: if you choose this option, please provide some reasoning)
|
  
|
7 |
53.85% |
04-07-2007, 06:58 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
|
FE Team Challenge -- Scoring Poll
From the contest's discussion thread, the 3-gallon minimum requirement may penalize some members.
This essentially "Penalizes someone for being efficient in an efficiency contest".
It was determined that a weighted average places too much emphasis on the driver who may have to drive the most.
What do you think?
- Should we offer the opportunity to drop one member's data per team -- to get a 4-member average (the team captain makes the decision who to drop)
- Take a 3-Member average, by automatically removing the members' data with the maximum and minimum gallons consumed
- Just leave the 3-gallon minimum and disqualify that member for the month (if you choose this, a rationale as to why is requested).
Thanks for the Feedback.
-The Commish
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
|
Threaded Mode