|
|
03-12-2007, 03:26 PM
|
#31
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Country: United States
|
If basjoos mixed number is suppose to be 38 MPG I have the team EPA numbers as:
Team 1 (Man, we need to come up with a name)
77.92 %
Team 2
68.05 %
That's almost a 10% advantage for team 1. I think we need to be a little closer starting out. Why don't we add 7% to team 2 to bring them more into line. I'm guessing 1-3% for Metro cam swap since we don't have any data on that.
This of course depends if basjoos numbers are incorrect.
__________________
|
|
|
03-12-2007, 06:32 PM
|
#32
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 392
Country: United States
|
I updated my car to the new EPA numbers (42/33/37).
__________________
|
|
|
03-12-2007, 07:07 PM
|
#33
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
|
Under Modifications...
Quote:
It was originally powered by a 2.8 liter V6 gasoline engine and is now powered (more than equally, I might add) by a CARB compliant 1.9 liter inline turbo diesel I swapped in. Factory remote control for door unlock, window, sunroof and alarm added. Satellite radio receiver added. Class 1 (1,500 lb) tow receiver added.
|
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
03-12-2007, 07:17 PM
|
#34
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 467
Country: United States
|
NICE swap! I too wondered about the 130+% above EPA.
|
|
|
03-12-2007, 08:05 PM
|
#35
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brock
Oh ya that?s right. The diesel version was rated at 31-35-41. Should we use those numbers since that's what the diesel was rated at or is that just considered a modification? That might get team 1 closer to team 2 to start.
Just throwing out an idea as to who wins (beside all of us). Maybe go by a % change from what the numbers now to 1 month and 2 months and so on?
So right now
team 1 is 77.92
team 2 is 68.05
after a month say team one is at 79.92 and team 2 is at 71.05. The team 1 would be 2% up and team 2 would have beat us being 3% up?
That way we start where we were to even the playing field?
|
Lug_Nut needs to use the gas numbers. His wagon has been modified so it goes along with other modified cars.
From a previous post:
I think we need to be a little closer starting out. Why don't we add 7% to team 2 to bring them more into line. I'm guessing 1-3% for Metro cam swap since we don't have any data on that.
|
|
|
03-12-2007, 08:45 PM
|
#36
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Country: United States
|
I think we have 2 more things to iron out.
1. I think we should give team 2 a 7% handicap to start everyone at the same level. We'll keep that through out the competition.
2. The offical stats will be posted every 30 days. I think that it would be good to have weekly updates to see how it's going. The weekly stats would be based on fills and or FE instrumention(SG or SmID) if you have it. If you do not fill in a week just give the MPG for the tank off the SG. These numbers are just estimates because we go by actual fill data. We can have a thread for weekly updates that everyone post to on Sunday. When you record the data on the thread just list if it's actual or SG data and only one entry per week per car. If you don't have FE instumentation then will just use what's in the gaslog for your previous % epa.
|
|
|
03-13-2007, 09:36 AM
|
#37
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 615
Country: United States
|
Why don't we see who wins according to the % improvement each team makes above the starting epa numbers? This way we don't need handicaps and can avoid the inaccuracies of computing a handicap. For example, Team 1 starts at 77.92% and improves to 85%, a 9% improvement. Team 2 starts at 68.05% and improves to 75%, a 10% improvement. Team 2 wins!
__________________
Dave W.
|
|
|
03-13-2007, 09:52 AM
|
#38
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRW
Why don't we see who wins according to the % improvement each team makes above the starting epa numbers? This way we don't need handicaps and can avoid the inaccuracies of computing a handicap. For example, Team 1 starts at 77.92% and improves to 85%, a 9% improvement. Team 2 starts at 68.05% and improves to 75%, a 10% improvement. Team 2 wins!
|
I'm fine with that. Metro is that something you can work into the spread sheet?
|
|
|
03-13-2007, 10:44 AM
|
#39
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
|
Sounds good to me, yup.
|
|
|
03-15-2007, 09:46 AM
|
#40
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,223
Country: United States
|
I still haven't filled up yet. Does that mean I haven't officially started?
Do I have to bite the bullet and buy expensive gas, or can I wait until March break is over?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:06 PM.