|
|
09-18-2006, 01:35 PM
|
#11
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
|
Cool it until the alcohol freezes then filter it out.
__________________
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 02:03 PM
|
#12
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Country: United States
|
Can someone explain to me the purpose of the winter blend?
__________________
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 03:03 PM
|
#13
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
|
It is a more volatile mixture that vaporizes more easily in cold weather and ignites easier at a lower temperature to make starting easier. Ethanol is NOT easy to vaporize in cold weather so it should be an interesting winter.
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 04:15 PM
|
#14
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,225
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanGeo
It is a more volatile mixture that vaporizes more easily in cold weather and ignites easier at a lower temperature to make starting easier. Ethanol is NOT easy to vaporize in cold weather so it should be an interesting winter.
|
What about emissions? I understand that there is a 5% decrease in FE and a pretty good reduction in the GHG except NOx with is increased by 3-5%. But if it's so good for the environment why don't they use it year round?
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 04:42 PM
|
#15
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,444
Country: United States
Location: Tiverton, RI
|
Too volatile for the summer temperatures, that's the point, it's the winter blend for colder temperatures.
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 09:06 PM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 169
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theclencher
Seriously, I don't know what y'all are getting so worked up about. We are talking about E10- it's ONLY 10% ethanol. For the love of God, Minnesnowtans (winter- often cold and severe- for six months out of the year) have been burning E10 for years and in fact E85- yes, 85% ethanol- gets used YEAR 'ROUND here, no problem.
And as I understand it, the energy conversion for ethanol isn't as dismal as it used to be. So what's your problem?
|
There is at least a perception that e10 gives you negative hit in MPG but costs the same a straight unleaded.
The epa rating on e85 vehicles clearly shows the hit there.
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 10:11 PM
|
#17
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theclencher
And as I understand it, the energy conversion for ethanol isn't as dismal as it used to be. So what's your problem?
|
The problem is, when saving gas, EVERY PERCENTAGE COUNTS. People install grille blocks for 1%, LRR tires for 3%, HAI for 2%, for example, etc. If you start adding up the small stuff, that's where you start saving fuel. If you engine-off coast for 1/10 of a mile, it's perhaps a small amount of fuel saved. Do it 100 times, and you've saved a significant amount
It's the "Long Tail" effect. I-tunes sells more of the obscure one song downloads per month than they do the most popular 1000's-per-month. Picture a graph with the most popular downloads at the left, then decreasing to the right with the single-items. It produces a big chunk leftward curving down to a "long short tail". Collect all of those little-interest items, and it beats out the top sellers.
That's why we see it as a problem.
RH77
__________________
|
|
|
09-18-2006, 10:14 PM
|
#18
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theclencher
Trans cooler within radiator generally limited to automatics. Said cooler is quite small in capacity- I would guess one little squirt of warm fluid on start-up makes it to the tranny and that's about it.
|
True, but you can't dispute the power of the EBH -- it's proven. A warm squirt at first, yes, but if you cycle the fluid through an already-warm radiator, warm up is quicker. (and yes, it's for an automatic in this instance).
RH77
__________________
|
|
|
09-19-2006, 10:47 AM
|
#19
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 42
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theclencher
The FE hit from E10 isn't much. There is a FE penalty for E85 for engines not optimized for it, no doubt. Here, E85 costs less so often it's a wash.
|
Not realy a friend of mine has a Tahoe and said his mileage drops 20% when he runs E85. Around here E85 is only $.40 less than regular. So unless regular drops below $2.00 it is not worth it.
|
|
|
09-19-2006, 12:36 PM
|
#20
|
Driving on E
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,110
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron22
Not realy a friend of mine has a Tahoe and said his mileage drops 20% when he runs E85. Around here E85 is only $.40 less than regular. So unless regular drops below $2.00 it is not worth it.
|
I'm curious to know how ANYONE can run E85 in a gasoline designed vehicle. E85 is 85% ethanol, and will definately damage your vehicle if it isn't designed to run it.
E85 should only be used in flex-fuel vehicles, or vehicles designed for ethanol.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
|