Driving 55...can't draft a trucker - Page 2 - Fuelly Forums

Click here to see important news regarding the aCar App

Go Back   Fuelly Forums > Fuel Talk > General Fuel Topics
Today's Posts Search Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-26-2007, 04:39 PM   #11
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 262
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erdrick View Post
Sitting back at 55mph lets you choose which truck to draft. When you find one that is going a speed that you like, then get on it! Where I am originally from, people very often drive with less than a single car length between cars, while driving at 70mph. Drafting is just common driving practice in Detroit. Sometimes you wonder if the vehicle in the back is actually being towed.

I personally saw a 10-15mpg increase when drafting in my parents' Lexus 400h, with the speed being anywhere from 60-65.
Drafting will have much more impact on a SUV then a litle car like a civic or a cavalier.
__________________

GasSavers_BIBI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 04:58 PM   #12
Registered Member
 
RningOnFumes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 72
Country: United States
To Bibi, I just ordered a Scan guage II, (anyone want a nice price I can give you the link in a PM--it's from a vw group buy.) So I will definitely be using that.

To Mira, P&G sounds great but from the gas saving sticky, it sounds a bit complicated, don't think I'll try it yet. About traffic, I think I will stick close to slower big cars, either stay infront or behind them. Today, I had cars come rushing around the big rigs, just to get on to my tail. I guess they thought I was ahead because I already passed, not knowing that I was probably the reason why the trucker was slow.

In retrospect, I don't think drafting helped me much. First of all, I wasn't close enough-- only about 2 or 3 car lengths behind (too scared to get closer). Second, my car is pretty decent in the aero factor in my humble opinion. I mean it's not a box like a xB or anything and it is low enough already.

Lastly, I don't think there should be any regulations. Maybe instead of or in addition to carbon credits, incentives for companies to stagger start times? -- money talks. Maybe do it by the category? Can't have supervisor's supervising empty plants can we?

I couldn't help but think that I wished I had a 6 speed instead so I can cruise at a lower rpm than in the 5 speed.

And you're right Bibi, I don't think I'll be drafting unless I'm in a caravan of cars.
__________________

__________________


RningOnFumes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 06:37 PM   #13
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 313
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIBI View Post
Drafting will have much more impact on a SUV then a litle car like a civic or a cavalier.
BIBI, I'd have thought the opposite is true. To me it seems harder to fit a wider vehicle cleanly into the slipstream. The slipstream gets affected by crosswinds and unless you're on a motorcycle (which gets a great boost and way too high pf a risk) it's difficult to find the sweet spot.
__________________
2TonJellyBean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 07:32 PM   #14
Registered Member
 
DarbyWalters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 376
Country: United States
But a larger vehicle (SUV) is pushing more wind normally...so the draft makes a big diff
__________________
2006 Jeep Liberty CRD...Founder of L.O.S.T.
OME 2.25" Lift w/ Toyo Open Country HTs 235/75/16s
ASFIR Alum Eng/Tranny/Transfercase/Fuel Skids
2002 Air Box Mod...Air Tabs (5) on Roof...(3)each behind rear windows
Partial Grill Block with Custom Air Scoop and 3" Open Catback Exhaust
Lambretta UNO150cc 4 Stroke Scooter



DarbyWalters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 08:36 PM   #15
Registered Member
 
trebuchet03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 812
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to trebuchet03
Quote:
Originally Posted by RningOnFumes View Post
In retrospect, I don't think drafting helped me much. First of all, I wasn't close enough-- only about 2 or 3 car lengths behind (too scared to get closer). Second, my car is pretty decent in the aero factor in my humble opinion. I mean it's not a box like a xB or anything and it is low enough already.
Mythbusters had a 22% (hrmmm... could be wrong, I'm going from memory) aero reduction at 7 car lengths There's no fine line of advantage, it's several shades of gray

EDIT: Forgot to mention, I've got some qualitative wool tuft photos attesting to this.

Quote:
BIBI, I'd have thought the opposite is true. To me it seems harder to fit a wider vehicle cleanly into the slipstream. The slipstream gets affected by crosswinds and unless you're on a motorcycle (which gets a great boost and way too high pf a risk) it's difficult to find the sweet spot.
Likely something similar to their increase in FE. 2 additional mpg for an SUV is much more significant percentage wise than 2mpg for basjoos
__________________
Time is the best teacher. Unfortunately it kills all its students.


Bike Miles (Begin Aug. 20 - '07): ~433.2 miles

11/12
trebuchet03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 08:40 PM   #16
Registered Member
 
DarbyWalters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 376
Country: United States
On a Bicycle in a pace line...the second rider uses 10% less energy in a headwind...the third rider uses alomost 20% less energy and the 4th rider 30% less...and that is just bikes.
__________________
2006 Jeep Liberty CRD...Founder of L.O.S.T.
OME 2.25" Lift w/ Toyo Open Country HTs 235/75/16s
ASFIR Alum Eng/Tranny/Transfercase/Fuel Skids
2002 Air Box Mod...Air Tabs (5) on Roof...(3)each behind rear windows
Partial Grill Block with Custom Air Scoop and 3" Open Catback Exhaust
Lambretta UNO150cc 4 Stroke Scooter



DarbyWalters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 09:42 PM   #17
Registered Member
 
rvanengen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 230
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by trebuchet03 View Post
Mythbusters had a 22% (hrmmm... could be wrong, I'm going from memory) aero reduction at 7 car lengths There's no fine line of advantage, it's several shades of gray

EDIT: Forgot to mention, I've got some qualitative wool tuft photos attesting to this.
Let's see the photos!
__________________
-- Randall


McIntyre's First Law: "Under the right circumstances, anything I tell you may be wrong."

O'Brien's First Corollary to McIntyre's First Law: "I don't know what the right circumstances are, either."



rvanengen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 09:58 PM   #18
Registered Member
 
trebuchet03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 812
Country: United States
Send a message via AIM to trebuchet03
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvanengen View Post
Let's see the photos!
Threaded

I'm actually quite peeved with myself at the moment... I can't seem to find my digital camera (with memory card) - which has more shots at varying distances. They're not particularly useful as stills (they look just like the one's as shown - which is why I only posted one set).... I'm more mad because of other photos on the camera that I haven't put on my computer yet....
__________________
Time is the best teacher. Unfortunately it kills all its students.


Bike Miles (Begin Aug. 20 - '07): ~433.2 miles

11/12
trebuchet03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 04:17 PM   #19
Registered Member
 
RningOnFumes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 72
Country: United States
Update:


I've been doing the pulse and glide. IT WORKS! Allows me to keep up with the traffic as well and it bumped up my mpg.

Well, getting a scan guage helped a lot.

So instead of a steady 55 or 60, I do the P&G and take advantage of the hills. Still have to get used to drafting. On the occasions when I do hit the sweet spot behind a car/truck/something big. It's like a tractor beam and I've got to train myself not to be quick to the brake pedal. The sweet spots pulls you right in~!

Finallly hit a minor mark: made it to 500 miles on a tank (11.1 total but ususally only fill about 10.2- 10.7)

Thanks guys.
__________________


RningOnFumes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2007, 08:31 AM   #20
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 447
Country: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erdrick View Post
Sitting back at 55mph lets you choose which truck to draft. When you find one that is going a speed that you like, then get on it! Where I am originally from, people very often drive with less than a single car length between cars, while driving at 70mph. Drafting is just common driving practice in Detroit. Sometimes you wonder if the vehicle in the back is actually being towed.

I personally saw a 10-15mpg increase when drafting in my parents' Lexus 400h, with the speed being anywhere from 60-65.
LOL! I live about 80 miles south of downtown Detroit, and Iv been there many times. I know what you are talking about! I remember driving 5 mph over the limit, and getting passed like I was parked, and by MANY cars in a line. They dont call it the Motor City for nothing! FE in rush hour Detroit traffic must be really difficult!
__________________

__________________
slurp812 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuelly API, Remote Update hufman Fuelly Web Support and Community News 6 11-26-2017 11:28 AM
Request: Days Between Fuel-ups artizhay Fuelly Web Support and Community News 5 10-30-2012 04:42 AM
Why Is there No App?! muffetmd Fuelly Web Support and Community News 8 03-11-2012 10:06 AM
more fuel up options slineaudi Fuelly Web Support and Community News 4 07-02-2010 03:11 AM
86% see need for more 35+ mpg cars Silveredwings General Discussion (Off-Topic) 13 03-03-2007 07:44 PM

» Fuelly iOS Apps
» Fuelly Android Apps
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.