|
|
10-28-2007, 10:25 AM
|
#21
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
The new camry has a few bugs in it and has caused toyota to slip to 3rd on new car reliability, honda is now first, hence my suggestion of the honda over the toyota,
Anywho, if he's not shopping new then that opens up a whole new can of wurms.
__________________
|
|
|
10-28-2007, 10:47 AM
|
#22
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,069
Country: United States
|
Wel, I'll find him the right car for his needs if he gives me budget and purpose.
__________________
__________________
three stripes the charm!
Car mods are overrated. Just gotta adjust that nut behind the wheel for best mpg.
Forget about World Peace...Visualize using your turn signal.
|
|
|
10-28-2007, 11:29 AM
|
#23
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 376
Country: United States
|
I think maybe you are jumping the gun a bit...more testing over a longer period of time/distance is needed. A paid for vehicle is already running much less $/mile that even a new/used not paid for economizer...or close to it.
I was wondering if the Air Tabs hurt in wet weather because they are now not only directing air but also water...which is much heavier? Just a thought. I think you were on the right track and just need to stick to it for a while longer. Perfect your driving techniques and don't expect miracles. I like the idea someone had about magnets on the bottom of the Air Tabs to make them easy to relocate and test.
__________________
2006 Jeep Liberty CRD... Founder of L.O.S.T.
OME 2.25" Lift w/ Toyo Open Country HTs 235/75/16s
ASFIR Alum Eng/Tranny/Transfercase/Fuel Skids
2002 Air Box Mod...Air Tabs (5) on Roof...(3)each behind rear windows
Partial Grill Block with Custom Air Scoop and 3" Open Catback Exhaust
Lambretta UNO150cc 4 Stroke Scooter
|
|
|
10-28-2007, 01:21 PM
|
#24
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffreymccoy
Since the above is true, and while I do care about other people, I naturally care more about my wife and kids. If it comes down to me or them, I'll choose them to loose that battle every time...
|
It's kinda sorta true and depends on your driving conditions. Trucks/SUVs are a double edged sword in that they are safer in collisions with smaller vehicles, but more dangerous in solo run off the road accidents or accidents involving something bigger than they are. So, overall, larger vehicles do little for occupant safety since they are as dangerous in some accidents as they are safe in others, but overall increase the risk for everyone else. That being said, if ya drive the vehicle in mostly crowded/slow city, then it may be safer than a smaller vehicle, however if ya use it for open highway, it may be more dangerous. Like everything else, YMMV.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
10-28-2007, 01:24 PM
|
#25
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,069
Country: United States
|
Your truck is not necessarily safer for your kids and family because of it has a high center of gravity. The reason I recommend a Camry or Accord is because these cars are not likely to flip - much less likely than your F150 - and they are big enough to be safe while still maintaining decent FE. I think the whole safety thing with big cars is more a perception thing than anything else. You feel safe in your F150 --and have become accustomed to the dominance over the road it has given you, and going into a lower to the ground car will make you feel less safe. But the reality and the perception do not correlate.
__________________
three stripes the charm!
Car mods are overrated. Just gotta adjust that nut behind the wheel for best mpg.
Forget about World Peace...Visualize using your turn signal.
|
|
|
10-28-2007, 01:47 PM
|
#26
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 64
Country: United States
|
Thanks for those words of insight regarding the safety issue. Will see how this goes. Im in deep contemplation at the moment.
|
|
|
10-28-2007, 03:44 PM
|
#27
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 87
Country: United States
|
I can personally vouch for the safety of medium/large cars versus SUV's/Trucks. A few years and a few cars ago, I had a '94 Olds Cierra that died rather violently when I got T-boned in the driver side door by an Explorer doing about 35 (I was doing about 40)
By all accounts it should have been a really bad accident, but I got out without a scratch thanks to the side-impact beams in the doors. I know it's kinda hard to take comfort in the fact that all that lies between you and the steel bumper of a 5000lb behemoth is a strategically placed steel tube, but I now know that that little steel tube works like a charm. I feel very safe in my little civic now that I know it has side-impact beams in the doors.
__________________
"I got 350 heads on a 305 engine. I get 10 miles to the gallon. I ain't got no good intentions." -The Drive By Truckers
Team OPEC Busters!
|
|
|
10-28-2007, 06:03 PM
|
#28
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 376
Country: United States
|
I just have to add the safety of a vehicle is directly proportional to the temperment and skill of the driver...
__________________
2006 Jeep Liberty CRD... Founder of L.O.S.T.
OME 2.25" Lift w/ Toyo Open Country HTs 235/75/16s
ASFIR Alum Eng/Tranny/Transfercase/Fuel Skids
2002 Air Box Mod...Air Tabs (5) on Roof...(3)each behind rear windows
Partial Grill Block with Custom Air Scoop and 3" Open Catback Exhaust
Lambretta UNO150cc 4 Stroke Scooter
|
|
|
10-28-2007, 07:56 PM
|
#29
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Country: United States
Location: Connecticut
|
For some real-world safety information see www.iihs.org.
International Institute of Highway Safety.
Among other things, they rate safety by actual stats of numbers of people killed in accidents in different models/years cars. They measure deaths per millions of cars so a model selling ten times as many cars gets rated on an even playing field with other models.
Not the thing to read if you get all upset over turning highway deaths into statistics. But you really see which models win and lose.
__________________
Currently getting +/- 50 mpg in fall weather. EPA is 31/39 so not too shabby. WAI, fuel cutoff switch, full belly pan, smooth wheel covers.
Now driving '97 Civic HX; tires ~ 50 psi. '89 Volvo 240 = semi-retired.
|
|
|
10-28-2007, 10:43 PM
|
#30
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,779
Country: United States
|
jeffreymccoy -
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffreymccoy
Thanks for those words of insight regarding the safety issue. Will see how this goes. Im in deep contemplation at the moment.
|
I find the "regular driving" tests make it hard to quantify mods because all the other parameters add up (weather, traffic, cargo weight, me, etc ...). Over time I think I have gotten my normal commute "down". The problem is, for certain mods that have only a 1-3% effect, normal driving can't give a clean answer because they are overwhelmed by everything else.
Question for someone else (basjoos?) : What's the cleanest MPG test you have seen on this site? For aero mods, it's the "coast-down a hill to a stop" test that is best, right?!?!?!?
CarloSW2
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
|