View Poll Results: Keep the current average, or implement a cumulative calcuation
|
Keep the Current Calcs: MPG for each tank is averaged in the total
|
|
0 |
0% |
New: Cumulative Miles per Cumulative Gallons = Final Result
|
|
12 |
100.00% |
|
|
07-26-2007, 06:02 PM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
|
Competition Averages
Background: Brucepick brought-up an excellent point:
The baseline and final averages are taken by averaging the MPG value in the GasLog. In this form, a cumulative value of total miles/kilometers, vs. total gallons is not taken.
A cumulative average seems to be more fair and accurate.
Vote:
1) Keep the Current System
2) Implement the total/cumulative average for the Cycle
This is a public vote. Please provide reasoning for your input. Thanks all!
The Commish
__________________
__________________
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 06:21 PM
|
#2
|
...
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 425
Country: United States
|
Cumulative. Maybe subdivide per quarter so as to see trends by season ?
__________________
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 06:39 PM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
|
I know I'm not playing, but if I understand correctly, the current situation: One tank may have only 3 gallons of "extra good behavior" then that tank would have the same weight as a 15 gallon tank of low mpg?
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 07:22 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,978
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skewbe
I know I'm not playing, but if I understand correctly, the current situation: One tank may have only 3 gallons of "extra good behavior" then that tank would have the same weight as a 15 gallon tank of low mpg?
|
Yup...
__________________
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 07:30 PM
|
#5
|
|V3|2D
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
|
man just as i expected, nobody voted for the average of mpgs. good.
i thought that they were the cumulative and the cumulative
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 07:42 PM
|
#6
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 245
Country: United States
|
I don't think a rules change in mid "season" is right. with the mileage that some get here they would only get 1 fill and it would get posted near end of cycle.
__________________
"Sylvie" 2000 Honda Insight 5 Speed
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 07:46 PM
|
#7
|
|V3|2D
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,186
Country: United States
|
i dont know about you, but i commute all year round... there is no mpg season.
if anything the winter is the mpg season because i cant race and my wife(teacher) is commuting daily again.
__________________
don't waste your time or time will waste you
|
|
|
07-26-2007, 10:41 PM
|
#8
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 245
Country: United States
|
I was actually pondering this the other day, and meant to bring it up. But was too lazy. I think we should change to the new system as it does seem more fair, shouldn't be that hard to implement either since everything is pulled straight from the site anyhow.
__________________
|
|
|
07-27-2007, 01:33 AM
|
#9
|
...
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 425
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thisisntjared
i dont know about you, but i commute all year round... there is no mpg season.
if anything the winter is the mpg season because i cant race and my wife(teacher) is commuting daily again.
|
You have no : spring summer fall or winter in Jersey ? Same temps all year 'round ? How about winter / summer fuel formulations ?
"2) Implement the total/cumulative average for the Cycle" <--- this will help balance what I ask about above .
|
|
|
07-27-2007, 03:28 AM
|
#10
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 460
Country: United States
|
rh77, Rick,
Guess I'm not understanding this very well. How does the proposed new rule differ from the currently posted Version 2.0 rule quoted below??
Excerpt from current Version 2.0 rules:
Calculations:
6. The ?Final Percentage over EPA? is figured by the cumulative, Gaslog-sourced MPG values vs. the vehicle?s EPA FE-Combined (?Cycle-End Cumulative Percentage Over EPA?)
7. A member?s final calculation is the difference between the Baseline and Cycle-End Cumulative? or ?Improvement? (negative numbers reflect a decrease in efficiency).
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:35 PM.