|
|
02-01-2007, 12:37 PM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
Country: United States
|
"CO ZX2" what have you done to your car ???
Snow and cold, bad MPG is holding me back a bit, but could not stay away from this site.
Just read top 10´s and find a big Ford making 70mpg ??? If this is correct this guy has a lot to learn me ! What on earth have you done to your car ?
3.357 L/ 100km. A car like this with 2L engine...
"Maybe I´m out on a very slippry ICE here ?"
What is the actual driving weight and relativ Cw for this machine ?
I want a Ford after this.
__________________
|
|
|
02-01-2007, 12:50 PM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 245
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elg
Snow and cold, bad MPG is holding me back a bit, but could not stay away from this site.
Just read top 10?s and find a big Ford making 70mpg ??? If this is correct this guy has a lot to learn me ! What on earth have yoy done to your car ?
In L/ 100km 0.3357. A car like this with 2L engine...
"Maybe I?m out on a very slippry ICE here ?"
What is the actual driving weight and relativ Cw for this machine ?
I want a Ford after this.
|
http://www.gassavers.org/showthread.php?t=2173
here's his introductory thread and shows the mods he was working on. he's snowed in rioght now ands comes here when he can.
__________________
__________________
"Sylvie" 2000 Honda Insight 5 Speed
|
|
|
02-01-2007, 01:30 PM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
Country: United States
|
Yes I?ve read that, just did it again. Is this figures absolute correct ???
Nearly 1200kg car, 2L engine, with mostly aero-skirts, making 70-117mpg ? You must be kidding.
Add these things to a small car and we?ll see 130mpg easy ?
I don?t belive it. Maybe we Swed?s are cazy...
|
|
|
02-01-2007, 01:47 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 245
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elg
Yes I?ve read that, just did it again. Is this figures absolute correct ???
Nearly 1200kg car, 2L engine, with mostly aero-skirts, making 70-117mpg ? You must be kidding.
Add these things to a small car and we?ll see 130mpg easy ?
I don?t belive it. Maybe we Swed?s are cazy...
|
it's not just the aero mods that are helping it's also Driving techiques.
__________________
"Sylvie" 2000 Honda Insight 5 Speed
|
|
|
02-01-2007, 02:14 PM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
Country: United States
|
I?m really sorry, still belive there is something wrong here.
Myself I allways check my distancemeter to a well known track, an error of max 1%. Every time at the pump it makes me sick about the uncorrect filling metod. Have not long ago once again been driving with 0.5L glas-messure-tube inside the car, terrible smell and not a very nice look from the police (ticket).
All these things to make the messure as correct as I can but here about the Ford there must be wrong.
|
|
|
02-01-2007, 02:35 PM
|
#6
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 675
Country: United States
|
Extremely skeptical, as well, personally.
|
|
|
02-01-2007, 02:39 PM
|
#7
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 771
Country: United States
|
I agree elg, it's hard to believe. He's got a kill switch and lives in the mountains though, high psi tires and aero mods. If he can maximize his mpg on the climbs with the scanguage I'm sure he can glide a LOOOONG way without burning ANY fuel on the way back down.
|
|
|
02-01-2007, 03:05 PM
|
#8
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,779
Country: United States
|
elg -
Quote:
Originally Posted by elg
Yes I´ve read that, just did it again. Is this figures absolute correct ???
Nearly 1200kg car, 2L engine, with mostly aero-skirts, making 70-117mpg ? You must be kidding.
Add these things to a small car and we´ll see 130mpg easy ?
I don´t belive it. Maybe we Swed´s are cazy...
|
Look at his total MPG and you will see he is in the 60 MPG range, right? I think the 100+ MPG is a part of a net downhill portion of a 2 leg run. Here is where I hypothesize as much :
http://www.gassavers.org/showpost.ph...postcount=1226
Now, get at the top of a hill on a big stretch of freeway. Reset your ScanGauge. Go down the hill in Neutral if it is safe or you have great brakes for staying within the posted speed limit. You will see *ungodly* MPG, and this is without turning off the engine. I think that this is what CO ZX2 has to work with for his downhill leg.
Remember that CO ZX2 has a kill switch and a race car driving past. If he says he's getting 100+ MPG, I believe him. He's got the skillz.
EDIT : The question to ask is, what is the net elevation change between each destination?
CarloSW2
|
|
|
02-01-2007, 03:23 PM
|
#9
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,516
Country: United States
|
I don't see any reason for skepticism, I can get near 45mpg out of the Camry coasting in N down about 3000ft over ~110 miles, god knows what 50 miles would be, probably 60-70mpg. Otoh, on the way back up, mileage is proportionately crappy, with the average being about what you would get on flat ground, give or take.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaTwo
I think if i could get that type of FE i would have no problem driving a dildo shaped car.
|
|
|
|
02-01-2007, 04:02 PM
|
#10
|
*shrug*
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,195
Country: United States
|
Yeah, well, darin has nailed way over 100 MPG on flat land, in town, so I don't see too much reason for skepticism. 2L isn't too large when the engine is off,
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
|