|
|
10-11-2009, 07:40 PM
|
#1
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 64
Country: United States
|
Civic VX - which tires is better to use for MPG
I know that the factory size is 165/70/13 but will 155/80/13 give me better MPG. When I bought my VX it cames with some new tires and I thought they were 175/70/13. Upon inspecting it, I found out that they were 185/70/13. I'm trying to purchase some new tires for it and I was debating between the 165/70/13 and the 155/80/13. Do you guys think I will be fine with some 175/70/13? What is best for MPG (92 civic vx FED Model).
__________________
|
|
|
10-12-2009, 04:23 AM
|
#2
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
|
I would suspect that the 185/70 would do best, if you could find them.
Between the 165/70 and 155/80 it's a toss-up. The 155/80 is a little taller but the 165/70 is a little wider. My research indicates that, counterintuitively, wider is better for fuel economy.
Is your driving more city or more highway?
__________________
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
|
|
|
10-12-2009, 10:35 AM
|
#3
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 392
Country: United States
|
By far better than any of these for increasing MPG would be to get a set of 14" wheels and get the 165/65/14 Bridgestone Potenza RE92 tires used on the Insight-I. I installed them on my car and their rolling resistance is well below that of any of the 175/70/13 or 165/70/13 tires that I've had on my car over the years.
|
|
|
10-12-2009, 05:35 PM
|
#4
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 64
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow
I would suspect that the 185/70 would do best, if you could find them.
Between the 165/70 and 155/80 it's a toss-up. The 155/80 is a little taller but the 165/70 is a little wider. My research indicates that, counterintuitively, wider is better for fuel economy.
Is your driving more city or more highway?
|
Actually I have the 185/70 on my car right now. I guess since it's a toss up between the 165 and 155 than I might just go with the 165. I drive 30% city and 70% hwy.
|
|
|
10-12-2009, 05:37 PM
|
#5
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 64
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by basjoos
By far better than any of these for increasing MPG would be to get a set of 14" wheels and get the 165/65/14 Bridgestone Potenza RE92 tires used on the Insight-I. I installed them on my car and their rolling resistance is well below that of any of the 175/70/13 or 165/70/13 tires that I've had on my car over the years.
|
If that's the case than I have always wanted to put my HX rims on. I'll see what's up. Thanks for the info.
|
|
|
10-12-2009, 05:56 PM
|
#6
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 11
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow
I would suspect that the 185/70 would do best, if you could find them.
Between the 165/70 and 155/80 it's a toss-up. The 155/80 is a little taller but the 165/70 is a little wider. My research indicates that, counterintuitively, wider is better for fuel economy.
Is your driving more city or more highway?
|
Quick question? Could you point me in the direction of the study that says wider is better for fuel economy. Thanks, Jim
__________________
2005 Astro 8 passenger van... plain jane...
I am Jim. She is AstroTurf, and yes she is fun to roll around in.
2005 Astro 8 passenger van... plain jane...
Nokian WR G2 SUV 215/70 16R
Dyna Beads Dynamic Balancing Solution
Aquapel Glass Treatment
Sylvania Xtravision
Pro-Cut PFM On-Car Lathe
|
|
|
10-12-2009, 06:47 PM
|
#7
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by astroturf
Quick question? Could you point me in the direction of the study that says wider is better for fuel economy. Thanks, Jim
|
There is a severe lack of good data and complete studies on rolling resistance.
In my sig, there is a link to my thread on tire width where I placed an excessive quantity of my thoughts and research. In short, I can't prove that either narrower or wider is better for fuel economy.
What I do have is an understanding of some underlying principles that don't get much thought in general.
- At a given pressure and load, contact patch is expected to be the same regardless of width. What changes is its shape; a narrow tire has a longer, narrower contact patch, which requires more sidewall deformation to make that contact patch. Sidewall deformation for making a contact patch is a major component (possibly the largest contributor) of rolling resistance.
* I believe that I am correct about all that, but I have doubts. Some data shows that modern automotive tubeless tires' contact patches don't adjust quite that way, unlike (for example) bicycle tires.
- A tire that holds more volume of air has a higher load capacity at a given pressure. Using less of a tire's laod capacity (again, at a specific pressure) means reduced rolling resistance. A wider tire holds more volume of air.
- One person's study: http://priuschat.com/forums/prius-te...rc-4-data.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by that study
Michelin Tiger Paw AWP P225/60R16 at .00683 - a 25lb tire. On both these model lines, the smaller/lighter/narrower the tire gets, the higher its RRC/4.
|
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
|
|
|
10-12-2009, 06:52 PM
|
#8
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
|
There's also these issues, which may be less important: - Aerodynamic drag - narrower tire is better.
- Keeping your momentum around turns - wider tire is better.
Both would have a tiny, immeasurable effect on your fuel economy.
Additional issues: - Circumference/diameter - A taller tire will raise your effective gearing, lowering your RPM. Although the sizes in question are nominally similar in diameter, they are a little different.
- Tread life vs. price - IMO, this is the most important issue to consider. If you save $20 in gas over the life of the tires but have to buy tires more often then you've lost.
- Pressure - Check the maximum pressure rating of each tire you're considering. I'd rate this as second most important.
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
|
|
|
10-12-2009, 07:05 PM
|
#9
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 11
Country: United States
|
the holy cow, Could you give a size comparison to wrap my thoughts around. Thanks, Jim
__________________
2005 Astro 8 passenger van... plain jane...
I am Jim. She is AstroTurf, and yes she is fun to roll around in.
2005 Astro 8 passenger van... plain jane...
Nokian WR G2 SUV 215/70 16R
Dyna Beads Dynamic Balancing Solution
Aquapel Glass Treatment
Sylvania Xtravision
Pro-Cut PFM On-Car Lathe
|
|
|
10-12-2009, 07:09 PM
|
#10
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,624
Country: United States
|
What sizes would I compare?
I really can't quantify the possible gains. It's all theory, there's barely any data out there.
__________________
__________________
This sig may return, some day.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Car Talk & Chit Chat |
|
|
|
|
|
» Fuelly iOS Apps |
|
|
|
» Fuelly Android Apps |
No Threads to Display.
|
|