Quote:
Originally Posted by lovemysan
Even though its this way it shouldn't be a huge issue. If you drive consistently you'll still see decent accuracy simply by calibrating the SG over 5 or so tanks.
My scangauge got reset the other day after getting it calibrated I noticed that the miles reported were not always accurate but the mpg reported was within .5%. Which is good enough for me. Basically I think the SG will be set to show an average between leanburn and regular. This number will gradually go up as the owner gets more adept at controlling leanburn. Which means an FE surprise every time you pump! yay
|
It looks like you may be right, lovemysan. I emailed Scangauge (Ron DeLong) about the HX and received this response:
"People who have used the ScanGaugeII have not noticed a significant error in the fuel economy in the HX. During very low fuel flow, the pulsewidth of the injectors gets extremely short and the transition time from off-to-on and on-to-off starts becoming a significant part of the injection time. The algorithm we use is able to compensate some of this out, but to some extent this is a characteristic of the injectors and drive current to them, so linearity at the low-flow end does suffer.
Luckily, the majority of the fuel is used at the higher pulsewidths so, the net error over a trip or tank of fuel is very small even though the instantaneous error during lean burn is higher."
I think I'll leave the HX in the running for the next car purchase.