Quote:
Originally Posted by guest001
is this really worth doing? the cost of operating it vs extra fuel used when its cold?? cost wise i mean. technically it would have to increase mileage.
wait is this necessarly for mileage or to be able to get in your car warm?? cause just cause the block is hot doesn't mean the o2 is hot. it's still going to take time to heat up the o2.
|
The real payback is in your time and comfort, as well as reduced wear on the motor.
Last year (before my heater core completely plugged up), the tank style heater I installed on the Tercel was a huge help. Not only did the car simply start up and stay running without any issues, but I had a defroster that actually worked from the first turn of the key. So I was able to literally get in it and go. Without the block heater, the Tercel liked to idle very high, stall, and didn't produce any useable defrost heat for several minutes worth of driving, creating a safety issue with me having to manually wipe down the inside of the glass as I drove if I didn't let it idle up to temp before leaving. Of course this is in a car that now does not have a functioning O2 circuit.
Regardless of the oxygen sensor warmup however is the baseline fuel and startup mapping. Even without the input of the sensor taken into account, every modern ECU has a temperature compensation map. So a cold motor will always run significantly more rich than a warm motor regardless of whether it is in closed or open loop mode. When I programmed the fuel map for my race car several years back, I had to enrich the cold start map by as much as 60% to get a sustainable idle - in addition to the higher startup idle speed map which was also temperature compensated.
So the bottom line is that block heaters do save fuel. They also save time and hassle, as well as make otherwise cold starts more comfortable inside. It will take years to get your money back on fuel savings, but fortunately you get more out of them than that.
__________________