lovemysan -
I was asking saturnfans.com how I could :
Infer engine temperature from coolant temperature?
http://www.saturnfans.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=102238
Quote:
Hello -
What is more representative of the engine block temperature? The engine coolant temperature or the exhaust temperature?
... blah blah blah ...
|
To make a short story long, the thread segwayed to the reason I wanted to know the engine temp, IAT resistors and A/F ratios. Soooo, I did a test. It is *far* from perfect, but here is a picture of the data :
Attachment 651
Here are the defects with my test as I see them :
1 - I should have disabled the HAI (Hot Air Intake) in order to create a "stock" Saturn baseline configuration. Still, the HAI is "real" hot air, as opposed to the resistor, which *should* be in conflict with the 02 sensor.
2 - I should have a better and longer road to use for ABAB tests. A longer road might show the MPG go down over time as the ECU/PCM adjusts to the 02 sensor.
3 - I should do many more MPG tests, maybe 5 in each direction.
4 - I should have more fake IAT resistor settings for different temperatures.
5 - These are scangauge-based MPG figures. I can't explain it correctly, but the scangauge uses the "injector pulse width" to calculate MPG :
Scan Gauge 2 How it works
http://www.gassavers.org/showthread....injector+pulse
Quote:
I thought it read the injector pulse width from the ECU and calculated fuel usage from that.
|
A shorter pulse width with each IAT resistor mod would imply lean-burn because the composition of the air coming into the car is the same for each test. Could the car be maintaining speed with less fuel
and less air? The scangauge can't show me this for the purpose of this kind of test because it doesn't average MAP and TPS over time. I would need something like the CarChip for that
.
...
However, I still feel good about the test because I think a clear trend is present.
The following is what really surprised me :
Attachment 652
The graph came out to be very linear. I was expecting at least some kind of curve.
PS - I don't think I should call this a true Air/Fuel Ratio. I should call it a
Pseudo-IAT/AF Ratio because I am deriving it from other data, not the 02 sensor.
CarloSW2